Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:21:26.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biphasic Polymeric Shell-Core 3D Fiber Deposited Scaffolds Enhance Chondrocyte Differentiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Lorenzo Moroni
Affiliation:
[email protected], Twente University, Polymer Chemistry and Biomaterials, Prof. Bronkhorstlaan 10D, Bilthoven, Utrecht, 3581 KH, Netherlands, +31302295201, +31302280255
Jeanine A.A. Hendriks
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Twente, Polymer Chemistry and Biomaterials, Prof. Bronkhorstlaan 10D, Bilthoven, Utrecht, 3723 MB, Netherlands
Roka Schotel
Affiliation:
[email protected], CellCoTec B.V., Prof. Bronkhorstlaan 10D, Bilthoven, Utrecht, 3723 MB, Netherlands
Joost R. de Wijn
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Twente, Polymer Chemistry and Biomaterials, Prof. Bronkhorstlaan 10D, Bilthoven, Utrecht, 3723 MB, Netherlands
Clemens A. van Blitterswijk
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Twente, Polymer Chemistry and Biomaterials, Prof. Bronkhorstlaan 10D, Bilthoven, Utrecht, 3723 MB, Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

3D fibrous scaffolds with shell-core fiber architecture offer the possibility to create multifunctional structures. In this study, a construct that combines mechanical stability with the core polymer and optimal surface properties for cell-material interactions with the shell polymer is discussed. Scaffolds were fabricated by a rapid prototyped technique known as 3D Fiber Deposition (3DF) and used for cartilage tissue engineering. Cells maintained the typical rounded morphology of cartilage in the shell-core scaffolds, while they spread into a spindle-like shape in scaffolds fabricated with the core polymer only. Extracellular matrix production and an increase in the dynamic stiffness of the engineered construct revealed a progressive maturation of the formed tissue, suggesting that shell-core 3D scaffolds could be optimal for cartilage tissue engineering.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hutmacher, D. W., Scaffold design and fabrication technologies for engineering tissues--state of the art and future perspectives. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2001, 12, (1), 107–24.Google Scholar
2. Dooley, J. Viscoelastic Flow Effects in Multilayer Polymer Coextrusion. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 2002.Google Scholar
3. Woodfield, T. B.; Miot, S.; Martin, I.; van Blitterswijk, C. A.; Riesle, J., The regulation of expanded human nasal chondrocyte re-differentiation capacity by substrate composition and gas plasma surface modification. Biomaterials 2006, 27, (7), 1043–53.Google Scholar
4. Mahmood, T. A.; de Jong, R.; Riesle, J.; Langer, R.; van Blitterswijk, C. A., Adhesion-mediated signal transduction in human articular chondrocytes: the influence of biomaterial chemistry and tenascin-C. Exp Cell Res 2004, 301, (2), 179–88.Google Scholar
5. Moroni, L.; de Wijn, J. R.; van Blitterswijk, C. A., 3D fiber-deposited scaffolds for tissue engineering: Influence of pores geometry and architecture on dynamic mechanical properties. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 974985.Google Scholar