Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:35:10.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biomedical Nanoscience: Electrospinning Basic Concepts, Applications, and Classroom Demonstration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Kristin J. Pawlowski ,
Catherine P. Barnes ,
Eugene D. Boland ,
Gary E. Wnek  and
Gary L. Bowlin
Kristin J. Pawlowski
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth UniversityP.O. Box 980694-0694, Richmond, VA, 23298-0694, U.S.A.
Catherine P. Barnes
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth UniversityP.O. Box 980694-0694, Richmond, VA, 23298-0694, U.S.A.
Eugene D. Boland
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth UniversityP.O. Box 980694-0694, Richmond, VA, 23298-0694, U.S.A.
Gary E. Wnek
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth UniversityP.O. Box 843068-3068, Richmond, VA, 23284-3068, U.S.A.
Gary L. Bowlin
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth UniversityP.O. Box 980694-0694, Richmond, VA, 23298-0694, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Electrospinning is an old polymer processing technique that has recently been rediscovered. It allows for the easy creation of nano- to micro-fibers that can be collected to form a non-woven structure, which can then be used to fabricate novel structures for various applications including tissue engineering scaffolds, clothing, drug delivery vehicles, and filtration media. Current research in our laboratories is focused on the processing of synthetic and biological polymers to create materials with tailored properties and functions for tissue engineering scaffolds and various other medical applications. This technology is revolutionizing the biomaterials and nanotechnology fields and has prompted us to incorporate its history, basic concepts, and applications into diverse courses such as Biomaterials, Tissue Engineering, Polymers in Medicine, and Senior Design in Chemical and Biomedical Engineering. This Innovation of the Curriculum is timely and crucial for multiple reasons. There is a need for a systematic approach to course structure that ties historical concepts to new materials and processes and, ultimately, to practical applications. Combining this lecture organization with active learning in the forms of open discussions and hands-on experiments/demonstrations will enhance learning outcomes (including retention and critical thinking) at all levels of education. At the undergraduate and graduate levels in the courses mentioned, discussions of electrospinning can create a classroom atmosphere of creative thinking, and an actual demonstration of nanomaterial fabrication can serve as a visual aid to the students. More importantly, this curriculum innovation can be used at the high school level to demonstrate nanotechnology and its applications to medicine, which will aid in sparking the interest of future generations of tissue engineers, biomaterial scientists, nanotechnologists, and scientists and engineers in general.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 827: Symposium BB – Educating Tomorrow's materials Scientists & Engineers , 2004 , BB1.7
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rayleigh, Lord, The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 44, 184 (1882).Google Scholar
2. Bognitzki, M., Frese, T., Wendorff, J. H. et al. , Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society 219, U491 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Reneker, D. H. and Chun, I., Nanotechnology 7 (3), 216 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Deitzel, J. M., Kleinmeyer, J., Harris, D. et al. , Polymer 42 (1), 261 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Zeleny, J., The Physical Review X (1), 1 (1917).Google Scholar
6. Kim, B. S. and Reneker, D. H., Polymer Composites 20 (1), 124 (1999).Google Scholar
7. Taylor, G., Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 313, 453 (1969).Google Scholar
8. Doshi, J. and Reneker, D. H., Journal of Electrostatics 35 (2-3), 151 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Kim, J. S. and Lee, D. S., Polymer Journal 32 (7), 616 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Baumgarten, P.K., Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 36 (1), 71 (1971).Google Scholar
11. Srinivasan, G. and Reneker, D. H., Polymer International 36 (2), 195 (1995).Google Scholar
12. Chun, I., Reneker, D. H., Fong, H. et al. , Journal of Advanced Materials 31 (1), 36 (1999).Google Scholar
13. Fong, H., Chun, I., and Reneker, D. H., presented at the 24th Biennial Conference on Carbon, 1999 (unpublished).Google Scholar
14. Deitzel, J. M., Tan, N. C. Beck, Kleinmeyer, J. D. et al. , Report No. ARL-TR-1989, 1999.Google Scholar
15. Jaeger, R., Bergshoef, M. M., Batlle, C. M. I. et al. , Macromolecular Symposia 127, 141 (1998).Google Scholar
16. Kim, J. S. and Reneker, D. H., Polymer Engineering and Science 39 (5), 849 (1999).Google Scholar
17. Gibson, P. W., Schreuder-Gibson, H. L., and Pentheny, C., Journal of Coated Fabrics 28, 63 (1999).Google Scholar
18. Gibson, P. W., Schreuder-Gibson, H. L., and Rivin, D., AIChE Journal 45 (1), 190 (1999).Google Scholar
19. Reneker, D. H., Yarin, A. L., Fong, H. et al. , Journal of Applied Physics 87 (9), 4531 (2000).Google Scholar
20. Buchko, C. J., Kozloff, K. M., Sioshansi, A. et al. , Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 414, 23 (1996).Google Scholar
21. Buchko, C. J., Chen, L. C., Shen, Y. et al. , Polymer 40 (26), 7397 (1999).Google Scholar
22. How, T. V., United States of America Patent No. 4,552,707 (1985).Google Scholar
23. Chun, I., Doctoral Dissertation, University of Akron, 1995.Google Scholar
24. Stitzel, J. D., Master's Thesis, Virginia Commonwealth University, 2000.Google Scholar
25. Stitzel, J. D., Pawlowski, K. J., Wnek, G. E. et al. , Journal of Biomaterials Applications 15, 1 (2001).Google Scholar
26. Boland, E. D., Wnek, G. E., and Bowlin, G. L., The Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, eds.Bowlin, G. L. and Wnek, G. E. (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York), Volume 2, 1246, (2004).Google Scholar
27. Boland, E. D., Wnek, G. E., Simpson, D. G. et al. , Journal of Macromolecular Science-Pure and Applied Chemistry 38 (12), 1231 (2001).Google Scholar
28. Boland, E.D., Telemeco, T., Simpson, D.G. et al. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, In Press.Google Scholar
29. Perry, D. and Craig, A., Collagen fibrils during development and maturation and their contribution to the mechanical attributes of connective tissue. (CRC Press, 1988).Google Scholar
30. Khaleduzzaman, M., Sumiyoshi, H., Ueki, Y. et al. , Genomics 45 (2), 304 (1997).Google Scholar
31. Thumb, W., Graf, C., Parslow, T. et al. , Spectrochimica Acta. Part A, Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 55A (13), 2729 (1999).Google Scholar
32. Sparrow, J.T., Sparrow, D.A., Fernando, G. et al. , Biochemistry 31 (4), 1065 (1992).Google Scholar
33. How, T.V., Guidoin, R., and Young, S.K., Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine 206 (2), 61 (1992).Google Scholar
34. Wong, W. H. and Mooney, D. J., in Synthetic Biodegradable Polymer Scaffold, eds. Atala, A., Mooney, D., Vacanti, J. P. et al. , Birkhauser, Boston, 50 (1997).Google Scholar
35. Matthews, J. A., Wnek, G. E., Simpson, D. G. et al. , Biomacromolecules 3 (2), 232 (2002).Google Scholar
36. Wnek, G.E., Carr, M.E., Simpson, D.G. et al. , Nano Letters 3, 213 (2003).Google Scholar
37. Carr, M.E. and Hermans, J.. Macromolecules 11, 46 (1978).Google Scholar
38. Carr, M.E. and Gabriel, D.A.. Macromolecules 13, 1473 (1980).Google Scholar
39. Woodhead, J.L., Nagaswami, C., Matsuda, M. et al. , Journal of Biological Chemistry 271, 4946 (1996).Google Scholar
40. Drift, A.C.M. van der and Poppema, A.. Fibrinogen: Structure, Functional Aspects, Metabolism. eds. Haverkate, F., Henschen, A., Nieuwenhuizen, W. and Straub, P. W., Walter de Gruyter, New York, NY, 3 (1983).Google Scholar
41. Kenawy, E., Layman, J., Matthews, J.A. et al. Biomaterials 24, 907 (2003).Google Scholar
42. Kessick, R., Fenn, J. and Tepper, G. C., Polymer 45, 2981 (2004).Google Scholar