Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:28:25.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Band Gap Opening of Graphene after UV/Ozone and Oxygen Plasma Treatments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2011

Adrianus I. Aria
Affiliation:
Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
Adi W. Gani
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
Morteza Gharib
Affiliation:
Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
Get access

Abstract

Graphene grown by Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) on nickel subsrate is oxidized by means of oxygen plasma and UV/Ozone treatments to introduce bandgap opening in graphene. The degree of band gap opening is proportional to the degree of oxidation on the graphene. This result is analyzed and confirmed by Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy/Spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy measurements. Compared to conventional wet-oxidation methods, oxygen plasma and UV/Ozone treatments do not require harsh chemicals to perform, allow faster oxidation rates, and enable site-specific oxidation. These features make oxygen plasma and UV/Ozone treatments ideal candidates to be implemented in high-throughput fabrication of graphene-based microelectronics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Geim, A., and Novoselov, K., Nature Materials 6, 183 (2007).Google Scholar
[2] Neto, A. C. et al. ., Reviews of modern physics 81, 109 (2009).Google Scholar
[3] Oostinga, J. et al. ., Nature Materials 7, 151 (2008).Google Scholar
[4] Nakada, K. et al. ., Physical review. B, Condensed matter 54, 17954 (1996).Google Scholar
[5] Han, M. et al. ., Physical Review Letters 98, 206805 (2007).Google Scholar
[6] Ponomarenko, L. et al. ., Science 320, 356 (2008).Google Scholar
[7] Gierz, I. et al. ., Nano letters 8, 4603 (2008).Google Scholar
[8] Wehling, T. et al. ., Nano letters 8, 173 (2008).Google Scholar
[9] Luo, Z. et al. ., Applied physics letters 94, 111909 (2009).Google Scholar
[10] Hummers, W., and Offeman, R., Journal of the American Chemical Society 80, 1339 (1958).Google Scholar
[11] Park, S., and Ruoff, R., Nature nanotechnology 4, 217 (2009).Google Scholar
[12] Sun, X. et al. ., Nano Research 1, 203 (2008).Google Scholar
[13] Li, D. et al. ., Nature nanotechnology 3, 101 (2008).Google Scholar
[14] Becerril, H. et al. ., ACS nano 2, 463 (2008).Google Scholar
[15] Dresselhaus, M. S. et al. ., Nano letters 10, 751 (2010).Google Scholar
[16] Reina, A. et al. ., Nano letters 9, 30 (2008).Google Scholar
[17] Nourbakhsh, A. et al. ., Nanotechnology 21, 435203 (2010).10.1088/0957-4484/21/43/435203Google Scholar