Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:33:38.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

As Review Of Conventional And Non-Conventional Pore Characterization Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Rosario Gerhardt
Rosario Gerhardt*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, Department of Ceramics, College of Engineering, P.O. Box 909, Piscataway, NJ 08855
Get access

Abstract

A series of techniqu1es were employed to characterize the pore microstructure of a group of colloidal silica-alkali silicate gels. Methods used included mercury penetration porosimetry, nitrogen desorption measurements, transmission electron microscopy, single and multiple small angle neutron scattering, nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation measurements, x-ray tomography and dielectric constant measurements. Comparison of results of pore volume, pore size and size distribution as well as homogeneity of the pore structure are presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 137: Symposium P – Pore Structure and Permeability of Cementitious Materials , 1988 , 75
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Klein, L. C., Ann.Rev.Mat.Sc. 15, 227–248(1985).Google Scholar
2. Schaefer, D. W., Martin, J.E. and Hurd, A.J. in Physics of Finely Divided Matter, ed. Boccara, M. and Hurd, A. J., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985,pp. 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Berk, N. F. and Hardman-Rhyne, K. A., Theory, I., J. Appl. Cryst. 18, 467–472(1985).Google Scholar
4. Glantschnig, W. J. and Holliday, A., Applied Optics 26, 983–989 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Halperin, W. P., D'Orazio, F., Bhattachaija, S. and Tarczon, J.C. in Molecular Dynamics in Restricted Geometries, ed. Klafter, and Drake, J.M.,John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1989, pp. 311–350.Google Scholar
6. Ackerman, J. L., Garrido, L., Ellingson, W.A. and Weyard, J. D., Proc. Conf.on NDE of High Performance Ceramics, Aug. 1987.Google Scholar
7. Ruben, G. C. and Shafer, M. W., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp., VOl. 73, 207–212(1986).Google Scholar
8. Shoup, R. D., J. Coll. Int. Sc. 3, 63–69 (1976).Google Scholar
9. Cao, W., Gerhardt, R. and Wachtman, J. B. Jr. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71,1108–1113 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Bhattacharja, S., D'Orazio, F., Tarczon, J.C., Halperin, W.P. and Gerhardt, R., submitted to J. Am. Ceram. Soc.Google Scholar
11. Glantschnig, W. J., unpublished.Google Scholar
12. Cao, W., Gerhardt, R. and Wachtman, J. B. Jr., in Advances in Ceramics, Vol.26, The American Ceramic Society, in press.Google Scholar
13. Gerhardt, R. and Grossman, T. R., to be published.Google Scholar
14. Kerch, H. and Gerhardt, R., Ceramic Transactions, in press.Google Scholar
15. Long, G. G., Krueger, S. T. and Gerhardt, R., Ceramic Transactions, in press.Google Scholar
16. Gerhardt, R., Cao, W., Kerch, H., Long, G.G., Krueger, S.T., Bhattacharja, S., Halperin, W.P., Glantschnig, W. J. and Wachtman, J. B. Jr., to be published.Google Scholar