Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:26:32.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aromatics Enrichment in Refinery Streams using Solvent Resistant Membranes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Lloyd S. White
Affiliation:
Grace Davison Membranes, 8101 W. Midway Drive, Littleton, CO 80125
Craig R. Wildemuth
Affiliation:
Grace Davison Membranes, 8101 W. Midway Drive, Littleton, CO 80125
Get access

Abstract

Permselective separation of aromatic from non-aromatic hydrocarbons in feed streams can be accomplished by using membrane systems in hyperfiltration mode. In petrochemical or refinery operations, feed streams containing aromatics such as benzene, toluene, or xylenes can be selectively enriched or depleted in aromatics content. The development program for the STARMEM™ series of membranes led to a commercial process for their large-scale manufacture. A range of membranes in terms of flux and selectivity has been made, and both 2-inch and commercial scale 8-inch diameter spiral wound elements manufactured from these membranes. Tests at 800 psi (55 bar) and 50 °C with a toluene recycle stream have shown stable operation of these modules in hot hydrocarbons. The high efficiencies of these modules allow for high stage cuts (50% and greater) from process streams of thousands of barrels per day. By combining existing refinery operations such as distillation with these new membrane units, cost savings through better purity, recovery, or through-put can be achieved. With these membranes acting as tight hyperfiltration devices, the permeation properties can be modeled through a solution-diffusion equation for molecular transport. Since these membranes also act as solvent resistant nanofiltration devices, unusual benefits can be found while practicing aromatics enrichment of refinery streams, including fractionation of different molecular weight species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Matsui, S. and Paul, D.R., J. Membrane Sci. 195, 229245 (2002).Google Scholar
2. Wang, Y-C., Li, C-L., Huang, J., Lin, C., Lee, K-R., Liaw, D-J., and Lai, J.Y., J. Membrane Sci. 185, 193200 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Feng, X. and Huang, R.Y.M., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36, 10481066 (1997).Google Scholar
4. Adam, W.J., Luke, B., and Meares, P., J. Membrane Sci. 13, 127149 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Rautenbach, R. and Albrecht, R., J. Membrane Sci. 25, 123 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Chin, A.A., Knickerbocker, B.M., Trewella, J.C., Waldron, T.R., and White, L.S., US Patent 6 187 987 (13 February 2001).Google Scholar
7. Wijmans, J.G. and Baker, R.W., J. Membrane Sci. 107, 121 (1995).Google Scholar
8. White, L.S., J. Membrane Sci. 205, 191202 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Raman, L.P., Cheryan, M., and Rajagopalan, N., Chemical Engineering Progress 90, No. 3, 6874 (March 1994).Google Scholar
10. Bhore, N.A., Gould, R.M., Jacob, S.M., Staffeld, P.O., McNally, D., Smiley, P.H., and Wildemuth, C.R., Oil&Gas Journal 97 No. 46, 6774 (1999).Google Scholar
11. White, L.S. and Nitsch, A.R., J. Membrane Sci. 179, 267274 (2000).Google Scholar
12. Gould, R.M., White, L.S., and Wildemuth, C.R., Environmental Progress 20 No. 1, 1216 (2001).Google Scholar