Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:15:12.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Annealing and Leaching Studies With Natural and Artificial Obsidian Glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

T. D. MÄrk  and
G. Walder
T. D. MÄrk
Affiliation:
Institut für Ionenphysik, Leopold Franzens Universität, Technikerstr. 25, A 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
G. Walder
Affiliation:
Institut für Ionenphysik, Leopold Franzens Universität, Technikerstr. 25, A 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
Get access

Abstract

Annealing kinetics of fission tracks (produced by induced fission of U235 in natural and artificial (doped) obsidian glass has been studied by etching microscopy as a function of annealing time and temperature. The observed annealing characteristics can be best decribed by a two term exponential function with an Arrhenius type temperature dependence of the annealing coefficients. The activation energies deduced are (0.94 ± 0.16)eV and (1.04 ± 0.15)eV for artificial obsidian and (0.83 ± O.13)eV and (0.60 ± 0.16)eV for natural (fossil) obsidian, respectively. In addition, leaching experiments of obsidian samples exposed to different radiation, doses and rates have been made at two different leachate temperatures. At a temperature of 60°C the leaching rate of irradiated samples is much larger than that of unirradiated samples, whereas at a temperature of 90°C observed leaching rates are similar.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 112: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI , 1987 , 693
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See the MRS Symposium Series on the Scientific Basis for Waste ManagementGoogle Scholar
2. Fleischer, R. L., Price, P.B. and Walker, R.M., Nuclear Tracks in Solids (Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1975)Google Scholar
3. Weber, W. J., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VI, edited by Brookins, D. G. (Mater.Res.Soc.Proc. 15, Boston, MA 1982) pp. 407–414 Google Scholar
4. Walder, G. and Märk, T. D., presented at the 4th Conference on Radiation Effects in Insulators, Lyon, 1987; Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res.Sect.B, in press (1988)Google Scholar
5. Märk, T. D. and Ritter, W., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management X, edited by Bates, J.K. and Seefeldt, W.B. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 84, Boston, MA 1986) pp. 659–669 and references given thereinGoogle Scholar
6. Fletcher, R. C. and Brown, W. L., Phys. Rev. 92, 585 (1953)Google Scholar
7. Provencher, S. W., J. Chem. Phys. 64, 2772 (1976)Google Scholar
8. Nishida, T. and Takashima, Y., J. Sol. State Chem. 18, 313 (1976)Google Scholar
9. Bunker, B. C., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Manage- Ment X, edited by Bates, J.K. and Seefeldt, W.B. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 84, Boston, MA 1986) pp. 493–507 Google Scholar