Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:06:06.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An original flexible structure for Organic Photovoltaic Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Ornella Sanna
Affiliation:
Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, and INFM, Cagliari, Italy
Mario Cossu
Affiliation:
Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, and INFM, Cagliari, Italy
Tomas Pilia
Affiliation:
Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, and INFM, Cagliari, Italy
Annalisa Bonfiglio
Affiliation:
INFM – S3 Centre “nanoStructures and bioSystems at Surfaces”, Modena, Italy
Get access

Abstract

A simple idea is proposed for the realization of organic photovoltaic devices on flexible substrates. According to this, a poly(ethylene terephtalate) layer (Mylar), transparent, a few micrometers thick and completely flexible, works as mechanical support. It is an insulating material, which has good mechanical and dielectric properties and, most important, it is completely transparent to ultraviolet light. For this reason it could be suitable for being used as transparent supporting layer for large area photovoltaic devices. Furthermore, its mechanical properties allow to employ it in a roll-to-roll lamination procedure that could give rise to low cost extended films carrying solar cells on the surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Petritsch, K., Organic Solar Cells Architectures, PhD Thesis, www.solarpassion.com, (2000)Google Scholar
2. Tang, C. W., Appl. Phys. Lett., 48, 183185, (1986)Google Scholar
3. Brabec, C. J., Sariciftici, N. S. and Hummelen, J. C., Adv. Funct. Mater., 11, 1526, (2001)Google Scholar
4. Brabec, C. J. and Sariciftici, N. S., Monatshefte fur Chemie, 132, 421431, (2001)Google Scholar
5. Sariciftici, N. S., Curr. Op. Sol. State. Mat. Science, 4, 373378, (1999)Google Scholar
6. Forrest, Stephen R., Organic Electronics, 4, 4548, (2003)Google Scholar
7. Dimitrakopoulos, C. D. and Malenfant, P. R. L., Adv. Mat., 14/2, 99117, (2002)Google Scholar
8. Petritsch, K., Dittmer, J.J., Marseglia, E.A. Lux, A., Rozenberg, G., Moratti, S.C. and Holmes, A.B. and Friend, R.H., Sol.En.Mat.Sol.Cells 61, 6372 (2000)Google Scholar
9. Rostalsky, J. and Meissner, D., Sol.En.Mat.Sol.Cells, 61, 8795, (2000)Google Scholar
10. Shin, M. W., Lee, H. C., Lee, J.-G., Kim, Y., Jung, Y.-Y., Kim, S., Thin Solid Films, 363, 302305, (2000)Google Scholar
11. Aernouts, T., Geens, W., Poortmans, J., Nijs, J., Mertens, R., Synth. Met., 122, 153155, (2001)Google Scholar
12. Fujii, A., Zakhidov, A. A., Borovkov, V. V., Ohmori, Y. and Yoshino, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 35, 14381441, (1996)Google Scholar
13. Fahlman, M. and Salaneck, W.R., Surface Science, 500, 904922, (2002)Google Scholar