Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:49:10.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Experimental Study of the Dynamics of Contact Lines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. Kumar ,
M. O. Robbins  and
D. H. Reich
S. Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218
M. O. Robbins
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218
D. H. Reich
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218
Get access

Abstract

We have studied the dynamics of contact lines formed by water-alkane interfaces in capillaries with random surface disorder. We find that the contact-line velocity V scales with the applied capillary pressure P as V∼ (P – Pt)ζ over two decades in V. This is consistent with a critical depinning transition. We obtain this result by using a sensitive ac differential-pressure measurement technique to measure dP/dV. We find that dP/dV αV−0 8 (5) implying that 1/ζ = 0. 20 (5).

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 407: Symposium M – Disordered Materials and Interfaces-Fractals, structure and Dynamics , 1995 , 21
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Narayan, O. and Fisher, D. S., Phys. Rev B 48, 7030 (1993); T. Natterman, S. Stepanow, L. H. Tang, and H. Leschhorn, J. Phys. II 2, 1483 (1992); L. A. N. Amaral, A. L. Barabasi, H. A. Makse, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev E 52, 4087 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Fisher, D. S., Phys. Rev B 31, 1396 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Martys, N., Cieplak, M., and Robbins, M. O., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1058 (1991); Phys. Rev. B 44, 12294 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Robbins, M. O. and Joanny, J.F., Europhys. Lett. 3, 729 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Ertaş, D.; and Kardar, M., Phys. Rev. E 49, R2532 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Joanny, J. F. and Robbins, M. O., J. Chem. Phys. 92, 3206 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Raphael, E. and DeGennes, P. G., J. Chem. Phys. 90, 7577 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Kumar, S., Reich, D. H., and Robbins, M. O., Phys. Rev. E (Rap. Comm.) 52 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Stokes, J. P., Higgins, M. J., Kushnick, A. P., Bhattacharya, S., and Robbins, M.O., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1885 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Dixon, P. K. and Wu, L., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 60, 3329 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Sheng, P. and Zhou, M., Phys. Rev. A 45, 5694 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Charlaix, E. and Gayvallet, H., J. Phys. II 2, 2025 (1992).Google Scholar
13. Fermigier, M. and Jennfer, P., J. Coll. Int. Sci. 146, 226 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Mumley, T. A., Radke, C. J., and Williams, M. C., J. Coll. Int. Sci. 109, 413 (1986).Google Scholar
15. Calvo, A., Paterson, I., Chertkoff, R., Rosen, M., and Hulin, J. P., J. Coll. Int. Sci. 141, 384 (1991).Google Scholar