Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:12:50.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Examination of the Factors Which Determine the Thermal Spike Lifetime of a Displacement Cascade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

D.K. Tappin
Affiliation:
Now at: School of Metallurgy and Materials, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.
I.M. Robertson
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
M.A. Kirk
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL., USA
Get access

Abstract

The thermal spike phase of a displacement cascade is thought to be of fundamental importance to a number of issues in radiation effects. For example, the formation of stable vacancy clusters and the efficiency of ion mixing are thought to be directly controlled by the duration of the liquid-like state during the thermal spike. A number of factors have been proposed to be of significance to the lifetime of the thermal spike. For example, materials which have a high melting temperature, or which exhibit strong electron-phonon coupling, which provides an efficient method of energy transport to the surrounding material, are expected to have short lifetimes. We have examined these factors in detail and demonstrated that, in both elemental metals and alloys, electron-phonon coupling provides the most consistent explanation for variations in the thermal spike lifetime and, hence, the efficiency of ion mixing and the number of stable vacancy defect clusters formed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rubia, T. Diaz de la, Averback, R. S., Benedek, R. and King, W. E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1930 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Averback, R. S. and Seidman, D. N. Materials Science Forum 15–18, p. 963 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Averback, R. S., Rubia, T. Diaz de la and Benedek, R., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B33, 693 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Averback, R. S., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B15, 675 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Flynn, C. P. and Averback, R. S., Phys. Rev. B 38 (10), 7118 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Robertson, I. M., Tappin, D. K. and Kirk, M. A., Phil. Mag. A 68 (5), 843 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Tappin, D. K., Robertson, I. M. and Kirk, M. A., Phil. Mag A 70 (3), 463 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Jenkins, M. L., Kirk, M. A. and Phythian, W. J. 205, J. of Nucl. Mat., 16 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Biersack, J. P., Ziegler, J. F. and Littmark, U. The Stopping And Range Of Ions In Solids, (Pergamon Press, New York (1989)).Google Scholar
10. Bench, M. W., Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, (1992).Google Scholar
11. English, C. A. and Jenkins, M. L., Materials Science Forum 15–18, 1003 (1987).Google Scholar
12. Robinson, M. T. and Jenkins, M. L., Phil. Mag. A 43, 999 (1981).Google Scholar