Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:01:52.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Amber from 1000-Year Old Prehispanic Tombs in Northern Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Izumi Shimada ,
Ken B. Anderson ,
Herbert Haas  and
Jean H. Langenheim
Izumi Shimada
Affiliation:
Dept. of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale IL 62901
Ken B. Anderson
Affiliation:
Coal Chemistry Group, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
Herbert Haas
Affiliation:
Desert Research Institute, Las Vegas, NV 89154
Jean H. Langenheim
Affiliation:
Biology Dept., University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064
Get access

Abstract

Hundreds of large, shaped and perforated amber beads excavated from two Middle Sicán elite shafttombs at Huaca Loro on the northern coast of Peru represent the first scientifically documented case of amber use in prehispanic South America. Amber was highly valued and formed a key component of Sicán sumptuary good production. This paper describes the analytical procedures and archaeological and botanical background for source identification and cultural understanding of amber beads found on pectorals, necklaces and gold alloy objects. Samples were initially identified by XRD and FT-IR microscopy, followed by a more detailed and conclusive analysis using pyrolysis GC-MS. Radiocarbon dating points to a minimum age of 50,000 years. Results were compared with amber from known sources in the New World. Various lines of evidence suggest that the amber was derived from a heretofore unknown source, probably an ancient species of Hymenaea, possibly related to H. oblongifolia (family Leguminosae) occurring today in upper Amazonia.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 462: Symposium DD – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology V , 1996 , 3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Helms, M. W., Craft and the Kingly Ideal: Art, Trade, and Power. Uni v. of Texas, Austin, 1993.Google Scholar
2. Shimada, I., Cultura Sicán: Dios, Riqueza y Poder en la Costa Norte del Peru. (Banco Continental, Lima, 1995).Google Scholar
3. Shimada, I., in The Northern Dynasties: Kingship and Statecraft in Chimor, edited by Moseley, M. E. and Cordy-Collins, A. (Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C., 1990), pp. 297–392.Google Scholar
4. Beck, C. W., Applied Spectroscopy Reviews, 22(1), 58–61 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Anderson, K. B., in Amber, Resinite and Fossil Resins, edited by Anderson, K. B. and Creuing, J. C. (ACS Symposium Series No. 617, Am. Chem. Soc, Washington, D.C., 1995), pp. 105–129.Google Scholar
6. Anderson, K. B., Org. Geochem., (in press).Google Scholar
7. Anderson, K. B. and Winans, R. E., Anal. Chem., 63, 2901–2908, (1991).Google Scholar
8. Anderson, K. B., Winans, R. E. and Botto, R. E. Org. Geochem., 18(6), 829–841 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Anderson, K. B., Org. Geochem., 21(2), 209–212, (1994).Google Scholar
10. Langenheim, J. H., in Amber, Resinite and Fossil Resins, edited by Anderson, K. B. and Crelling, J. C. (ACS Symposium Series No. 617, Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, D.C., 1995), pp. 13, 21.Google Scholar
11. Hueber, F. and Langenheim, J. H., Geotimes 31, 8–10, (1986).Google Scholar
12. Anderson, K. B. and Langenheim, J. H., Unpublished results, (1996).Google Scholar
13. Lee, Y. T. and Langenheim, J. H., Systematics of the Genus Hymenaea L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Detarieae), (Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, 1975), p. 109.Google Scholar
14. Langenheim, J. H., J. Arnold Arboretum. 48, 203 (1967).Google Scholar
15. Langenheim, J. H., in [10], 1.Google Scholar
16. Langenheim, J. H. and Beck, C. W., Harvard Bot. Mus. Leaflets 22, 65 (1968).Google Scholar
17. Taylor, R. E., Radiocarbon Dating (Academic Press, New York, 1987), p. 212.Google Scholar
18. Haas, H., in Radiocarbon Dating, edited by Berger, R. and Suess, H.E. (1979), pp. 246–255.Google Scholar
19. Stuiver, M. and Polach, H. A., Radiocarbon 19, 355–363 (1977).Google Scholar
20. Shimada, I., Willay 42/43, 22–27 (1996).Google Scholar
21. Shimada, I. and Griffin, J. A., Scientific American, 270(4), 60–67 (April 1994).Google Scholar
22. Gordus, A. and Shimada, I., in Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology IV, edited by Vandiver, P. B., Druzik, J. R., and Galvan, J. L. (Mater. Res. Soc, Pittsburgh, 1995), pp. 127–142.Google Scholar
23. Kato, Y., in El Mundo Ceremonial Andino, edited by Millones, L. and Onuki, Y. (Senri Ethnological Studies No. 37, National Museum of Ethnology, Senri, 1993), pp. 216–224.Google Scholar
24. Alva, W. and Donnán, C. B., Royal Tombs of Sípán (Fowler Museum of Cultural History, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, 1993).Google Scholar
25. Langenheim, J. H. and Baiser, C. S., Viniculus 1, 72 (1975).Google Scholar
26. Baiser, C. S., in Akten des 34 Internationalen Amer ikanisten-Kongress (Wien, 1960), pp. 374–380.Google Scholar
27. Langenheim, J. H. and Baiser, C. S., in [25], 75.Google Scholar
28. Rostworowski, M., Revista Española de Antropología Americana 5, 135–177 (1970).Google Scholar