Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:01:04.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Composite Implants of Hydroxylapatite and Plaster for Correction of Bony Defects, Deficiencies and Related Contour Abnormalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Bill C. Terry
Affiliation:
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of North Carolina, School of Dentistry, CB#7450, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450
Ronald D. Baker
Affiliation:
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of North Carolina, School of Dentistry, CB#7450, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450
Myron R. Tucker
Affiliation:
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of North Carolina, School of Dentistry, CB#7450, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450
Jacob S. Hanker
Affiliation:
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of North Carolina, School of Dentistry, CB#7450, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450
Get access

Abstract

Methods have been devised for preparation of composite hydroxylapatite (HA)-plaster of Paris (PP) implants for augmentation of edentulous alveolar ridges. These implants may be used to correct bony defects, deficiencies, and related contour abnormalities. The HA-PP implants are customized to exactly conform to the underlying bony architecture. They can either be preformed and sterilized for later use or made directly or indirectly at surgery. In addition to maintaining the desirable biological, chemical and mechanical properties of HA, the HA-PP implant provides complete containment of the HA particles in the desired implant shape. The PP also contributes to an enhanced bony healing response and the HA-PP implant is very biocompatible.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Knize, D.M. Plastic Recosntruct. Surg. 53, 190199 (1974).Google Scholar
2. Baker, R.D. and Connole, P.W. J. Oral. Surg. 5, 541 (1977).Google Scholar
3. Baker, R.D., Terry, B.C., Davis, W.H..et al. J. Oral Surg. 7, 486 (1979).Google Scholar
4. Davis, W.H. et al. J. Maxillofac. Surg. 3, 103106 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Fonseca, R.J., Clark, P.J., Burkes, E.J..et.at. J. Oral Surg. 38, 572 (1980).Google Scholar
6. Terry, B.C., Albright, J.E. and Baker, R.D. J. Oral Surg.,32, 429 (1974).Google Scholar
7. Kelly, J.F. and Friedlaender, G.E. J. Oral Surg. 35, 268 (1977).Google Scholar
8. Feinberg, S.E. and Fonseca, R.J. In: Reconstructive Preprostheic Oral and Maxillifacial Surgery. Fonseca, R.J. and Davis, W.H., eds. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co. pp. 1939 (1986).Google Scholar
9. Stoelinga, P.J.W., Ed. Proceedings Consenus Conference: The relative roles of vestibuloplasty and ridge augmentation in management of the atrophic mandible. Chapters 15, 16. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing Co. (1984).Google Scholar
10. Glammara, B., Romaine, T. and Hanker, J. J. Dent. Res. 62:192 (1983).Google Scholar
11. Hanker, J. et al. Transactions World Congress on Biomaterials, Vol. VII, pp. 327 (1984).Google Scholar
12. Hanker, J. et al. J. Dent. Res. 2:195 (1983).Google Scholar
13. Terry, B.C. and Grisius, R.J. In: Proceedings Consensus Conference: The relative roles of vestibuloplasty andridge augmentation in management of the atrophic mandible. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing Co. pp. 109–118 (1984).Google Scholar
14. El, Deeb, M. J. Oral Maxillfac. Surg. 46:758766 (1986).Google Scholar
15. Hanker, J. et al. In: Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, Volume 55. pp. 77–96 (1986).Google Scholar
16. Dreesman, H. Beitr. Klin. Chir. Vol.9, pp. 804810 (1892).Google Scholar