Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:46:44.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aging Effects on the Durability of Tantalum Nitride Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

N. R. Moody ,
D. Medlin ,
D. Boehme  and
D. Norwood
N. R. Moody
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551-0969
D. Medlin
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551-0969
D. Boehme
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551-0969
D. Norwood
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 871185
Get access

Abstract

In this study, nanoindentation and nanoscratch testing were used to determine the effects of annealing and long term aging on the properties and fracture resistance of thin tantalum nitride resistor films on aluminum nitride substrates. These films were sputter-deposited to a thickness of 440 nm. Some films were left in the as-deposited condition while others were annealed or annealed and then aged. X-ray diffraction revealed that sputter deposition created high compressive residual stresses in the as-deposited films which were partially relieved by annealing. Subsequent aging of the annealed films had no effect on residual stress levels. Nanoindentation showed that mechanical properties were unchanged after annealing and after annealing and aging. However, nanoscratch testing showed that annealing markedly reduced the susceptibility to catastrophic failure with no further changes discernible after aging.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 505 , 1997 , 173
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Au, C. L., Anderson, W. A, Schmitz, D. A., Flassayer, J. C., and Collins, F. M., J. Mater. Res., 5, p. 1224 (1990).Google Scholar
2.Garrou, P., Advancing Microelectronics, 21, p. 6 (1994).Google Scholar
3.Palmer, R. H., Advancing Microelectronics, 21, p. 11 (1994).Google Scholar
4.Adams, J. R. and Kramer, D. K., Surface Science, 56, 482 (1976).Google Scholar
5.Brady, D. P., Fuss, F. N., and Gerstenberg, D., Thin Solid Films, 66, p.287 (1980).Google Scholar
6.Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M., J. Mater. Res., 7, p. 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
7.Doerner, M. F. and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res., 1, p. 601 (1986).Google Scholar
8.Hutchinson, J. W. and Suo, Z., in Advances in Applied Mechanics, edited by Hutchinson, J. W. and Wu, T. Y. (Academic Press Inc., vol.29, New York 1992) p. 63–191.Google Scholar
9.Moody, N. R., Medlin, D., and Norwood, D. P. in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties VI., edited by Gerberich, W. W., Gao, H., Sundgren, J.-E., and Baker, S. P. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 436, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997) p. 97–102.Google Scholar
10.Moody, N. R., Medlin, D., and Norwood, D. P., in Advances in Fracture Research, edited by Karihaloo, B. L., Mai, Y.-W., Ripley, M. I., and Ritchie, R. O. (Pergammon Press, Oxford, 1997) pp. 3075–3082.Google Scholar
11.Sun, R. C., Tisone, T. C., and Cruzan, P. D., J. Appl. Phys., 46, p. 112 (1975).Google Scholar
12.Moody, N. R., Hwang, R. Q., Venkataraman, S. K., Angelo, J. E., Norwood, D. P., and Gerberich, W. W., Acta Materialia (in press).Google Scholar
13.Venkataraman, S. K., Kohlstedt, D. L., and Gerberich, W. W., J. Mater. Res., 7, p. 1126 (1992).Google Scholar
14.Venkataraman, S. K., Kohlstedt, D. L., and Gerberich, W. W.,Thin Solid Films, 223, p. 269 (1993).Google Scholar
15.Evans, A. G., Ruhle, M., Dalgleish, B. J., and Charalambides, P. G., in Metal-Ceramic Interfaces edited by Ruhle, M., Evans, A. G., Ashby, M. F., and Hirth, J. P., Ritchie, (Pergammon Press, Oxford, 1990) pp. 345–364.Google Scholar