Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:25:56.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Advanced Methods of Concrete Characterization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

R. J. Lee ,
E. A. Draper  and
J. Skalny
R. J. Lee
Affiliation:
RJ Lee Group, Inc. Monroeville, PA 15146
E. A. Draper
Affiliation:
RJ Lee Group, Inc. Monroeville, PA 15146
J. Skalny
Affiliation:
RJ Lee Group, Inc. Monroeville, PA 15146
Get access

Abstract

The need for the rehabilitation of the infrastructure has lead to the adaptation of modem analytical methods for the characterization of concrete. These techniques are not commonly associated with evaluating concrete but promise to be very useful both as tools of quality assurance and in the determination of existing damage. This paper describes two such techniques, namely, coordinated electron-optical microscopy and gamma-ray tomography. Examples of the use and interpretation of each method are given.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 245: Symposium K – Advanced Cementitious Systems: Mechanisms and Properties , 1991 , 349
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Malhotra, V. M., Editor, “In Situ/Nondestructive Testing of Concrete”, American Concrete Institute SP-82, (1984).Google Scholar
[1] Lew, H. S., Editor “Nondestructive Testing”, American Concrete Institute SP-112, (1988).Google Scholar
[3] Slate, F. O. and Olsefsk, S., “X-Rays for the Study of Internal Structure and Microcracking of Concrete.” American Concrete Institute, Vol.60, pp. 575–587, (1963).Google Scholar
[4] Preiss, K., “Measuring Concrete Density by Gamma Ray Transmission.” ASTM Vol.5, No. 6, pp. 285–291, (1965).Google Scholar
[5] Forrester, J. A., “Application of Gamma Radiography to Concrete.” The Engineer, pp. 314–317 (February, 1958).Google Scholar
[6] Moore, J. F., “Evolution of Computed Tomography.” Materials Evaluation, pp. 630–638, (May 1990).Google Scholar
[7] Munro, J. J. III et al, “Mobile Computed Tomography Systems for Industrial Applications.” Materials Evaluation, pp. 568–672, (May, 1990).Google Scholar
[8] Herman, G. T., “Image Reconstruction from Projections: The Fundamentals of Computerized Tomography.” (Academic Press, New York, 1980).Google Scholar
[9] Martz, H. E. et al, “Computed Tomography Assessment of Reinforced Concrete” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Prepared for the 5th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials. Karuizawa, Japan, (May, 1991).Google Scholar
[10] Thaulow, N., Lee, R. J. and Holm, J., “An Integrated Optical-SEM Method for the Identification of Alkali-Silica Reaction in Concrete Sleepers”.International Symposium on Precast Concrete Railroad Sleepers, Madrid, Spain (April, 1991).Google Scholar
[11] Lee, R. J., Schwoeble, A. J., Wagner, K. E., Yuan, J., “Integration of Multiple Advanced Analytical Techniques to Study Alkali Silica Reactivity in Concrete Railroad Ties.” To be published in the Engineering Foundation Conference Proceedings on Advances in the Production and Utilization of Cement Based Materials, Potosi, MO, (1991).Google Scholar
[12] Schwoeble, A. J., Dalley, A. M., Henderson, B. C., Casuccio, G. S., “Computer Controlled SEM and Microimaging of Fine Particles.” Journal of Metals, Vol.40, No. 8, pp. 11–14, (1988).Google Scholar