Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:36:01.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adhesion in Metal-Ceramic Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Shankar K. Venkataraman
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
William W. Gerberich
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
David L. Kohlstedt
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Get access

Abstract

The adhesion of Pt thin films to NiO substrates has been studied using the continuous microscratch technique. Films of Pt ranging from 65 to 1080 nm in thickness were sputter deposited onto single crystals of NiO. Continuous microscratch experiments were performed by driving a conical diamond indenter, with a nominal radius of 5 μm, simultaneously into and across the film until a load drop was observed indicating that the film had delaminated. The practical work of adhesion was calculated using a theoretical model developed for metal-ceramic systems. The practical work of adhesion increases from 0.03 to 4.7 J/m2 as the film thickness increases from 65 to 1080 nm. The practical work of adhesion includes the true work of adhesion — the energy to produce two new surfaces — and terms involving the plastic deformation of the film and substrate. Extrapolation of the practical work of adhesion versus film thickness data to zero thickness yields a first order estimate of the true work of adhesion. The true work of adhesion for the as-sputtered Pt/NiO system is determined to be 0.025 J/m2, a value of the same order as the Van der Waal’s energy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Wu, T.W., J. Mater. Res., 6, 407 (1991).Google Scholar
2 Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 601, (1986).Google Scholar
3 Venkataraman, S., Kohlstedt, D.L. and Gerberich, W.W., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1126 (1992).Google Scholar
4 Mittal, K.L., Electrocomponent Science and Technology, 3, 21 (1976)Google Scholar
5 Perry, A.J., Thin Solid Films, 107, 167 (1983).Google Scholar
6 Chapman, B.N., in Aspects of Adhesion (Alner, D.J., Editor, CRC Press, Cleveland, Ohio) p.43 (1971).Google Scholar
7 Dannenberg, H., J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 5, 125 (1961).Google Scholar
8 Benjamin, P. and Weaver, C., Proc. Roy. Soa., London, A254, 163 (1960).Google Scholar
9 Weaver, C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 12, 18 (1975).Google Scholar
10 Laugier, M.T., Thin Solid Films, 117, 243 (1984).Google Scholar
11 Burnett, P.J. and Rickerby, D.S., Thin Solid Films, 148, 41 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Bull, S.J., Rickerby, D.S., Matthews, A., Leyland, A., Pace, A.R. and Valli, J., Surface and Coatings Tech., 36, 503 (1988).Google Scholar
13 Johnson, K.L., Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press 1985), pp. 5051, 68–70, 171–179, 427–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Benjamin, P. and Weaver, C., Proc. Roy. Soc., London, A252, 418 (1959).Google Scholar