Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:05:23.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adhesion Enhancement Via Crystalline-Embedded Entanglements in Melt-Processed Layered Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Phillip J. Cole
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Avenue SE Minneapolis, MN 55455
Christopher W. Macosko
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Avenue SE Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access

Abstract

Improving the adhesion of polyolefins to glassy polymers is complicated by the semicrystalline nature of the polyolefins. Traditional methods used in glassy polymers to increase the interlayer adhesion, including the addition of a diblock copolymer or the formation of a copolymer through in situ reaction, are still successful with semicrystalline polymers. However, melt miscibility of the adhesion promoting molecules is not the only consideration; co-crystallization can also be significant. Even when co-crystallization is achieved, the reactive method is shown to provide greater fracture toughness than the addition of a pre-made diblock copolymer. In the latter case, the formation of micelles limits the efficiency of the diblock copolymer. Finally, significant adhesion enhancement is attainable in reactive systems with contact times as short as 45 seconds as demonstrated through a multilayer coextrusion of amorphous nylon against a polypropylene-maleated polypropylene blend.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Creton, C., Brown, H.R., and Deline, V.R., Macromolecules, 27, 17741780 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Dai, C.-A., Kramer, E.J., Washiyama, J., and Hui, C.-Y., 29, 75367543 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Miller, R.C., Modern Plastics Encyclopedia, McGraw-Hill, New York (1998).Google Scholar
4. Ryntz, R.A., Prog. Org. Coat., 25, 7383 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Morris, B.A., SPE Antec, 116120 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Weimann, P.A., Jones, T.D., Hillmyer, M.A., Bates, F.S., Londono, J.D., Melnichenko, Y., Wignall, G.D., and Almdal, K., Macromolecules, 30, 36503657 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Duvall, J., Sellitti, C., Myers, C., Hiltner, A., and Baer, E., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 52, 207216 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Schrenk, W.J., Shastri, R.K., Ayres, R.F., and Gosen, D.J., U.S. Patent No. 5,094,788 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Boucher, E., Folkers, J.P., Hervet, H., Leger, L., and Creton, C., Macromolecules, 29, 774782 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Brown, H.R., J. Mats. Sci., 25, 27912794 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Kanninen, M.F., Int. J. Frac., 9, 8392 (1973).Google Scholar
12. Creton, C., Kramer, E.J., Hui, C.-Y., and Brown, H.R., Macromolecules, 25, 30753088 (1992).Google Scholar
13. Wu, S., Polymer Interface and Adhesion, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1982).Google Scholar
14. Birley, A.W., Haworth, B., Batchelor, J., Physics of Plastics, Hanser, New York (1992).Google Scholar
15. Macosko, C.W., Guegan, P., Khandpur, A.K., Nakayama, A., Marechal, P., and Inoue, T., Macromolecules, 29, 55905598 (1996).Google Scholar
16. Chaffin, K.A., Bates, F.S., Brant, P., Brown, G.M., J. Polym. Sci.: Part B: Polym. Phys., 38, 108121 (2000).Google Scholar