Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:48:33.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adhesion and Tensile Properties of a Novel Fiber-Metal Laminate Based on Polypropylene Reinforced with Aramid Fibers.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2014

Nancy G. González-Canché
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C., Mérida, Yucatán, México.
J.G. Carrillo*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C., Mérida, Yucatán, México.
R.A. Gamboa
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C., Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Get access

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to analyze interfacial adhesion and characterize the tensile properties of a FML elaborated from thin layers of an aluminum alloy and layers of maleic anhydride modified polypropylene (MAHPP) reinforced with an aramid woven fabric. For the analysis of interfacial adhesion, a microbond test is carried out on the MAHPP-aramid fiber system and a single lap joint test is performed on FML constituent materials, as well as the tensile characterization of the FML and its constituents is conducted accordingly. Microbond testing revealed an improvement in interfacial shear strength for the MAHPP-aramid fiber system in comparison with that of polypropylene-aramid fiber systems reported in the literature. The apparent shear strength between the FML constituent materials is comparable to that for bonding of aluminum with MAHPP. Tensile characterization of the FML and its constituents showed that the FML presented greater tensile strength than the aluminum alloy; and a more ductile behavior in comparison with its individual components due to the degree of adhesion between the constituents which allows the material to deform in unison.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Vermeeren, C.A.J.R.. Appl. Compos. Mater. 10, 189 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinmazçelik, T., Avcu, E., Bora, M.Ö., Çoban, O.. Mater. Des. 32, 3671 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo, J. G., Cantwell, W. J.. Mech. Mat. 41, 828 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, G., Cantwell, W.J.. Compos. Sci. Technol. 60, 1085 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, G., Kang, H.. Mater, J.. Process. Techol. 186, 284 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijsdijk, H. A., Contant, M., Peijs, A. A. J. M.. Compos. Sci. Technol. 48, 161 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M. A., Li, H. Z., Zhang, X. M.. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 27, 175 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamboa-Castellanos, R. A., Master DegreeThesis, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, 2011.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. S., An introduction to materials engineering and science for chemical and materials engineers, (John Wiley & Sons Publishers, New Jersey, 2004), p. 871.Google Scholar
Ochoa-Putman, C., Vaidya, U. K.. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Man. 42, 906 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J. M., Kim, D. S., Colloid, S. R. J. Interf. Sci. 264, 431 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar