Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:45:19.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Accurate Lattice Constant and Mismatch Measurements of SiC Heterostructures by X-Ray Multiple-Order Reflections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

XianRong Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, SUNY at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794–2275, U.S.A.
Michael Dudley
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, SUNY at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794–2275, U.S.A.
Philip G. Neudeck
Affiliation:
NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44135, U.S.A.
J. Anthony Powell
Affiliation:
NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44135, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

High-resolution X-ray diffraction (HRXRD) combined with other diffraction techniques is applied to characterize 3C SiC epilayers hoteroepitaxially grown on atomically flat mesas on 4H and 6H SiC substrates. Small-beam rocking curve scan and reciprocal mapping show extremely high crystalline perfection and homogeneity of the ideally grown 3C-SiC epilayers. Accurate lattice measurements based on X-ray multiple-order reflections reveal that: 1) no misorientation between the (0001) lattice planes across the 4H/3C or 6H/3C interface is detected, confirming the 2D nucleation mechanism of the 3C epilayer from a flat coherent interface; 2) in-plane substrate/epilayer lattice mismatch always exists, but the 3C epilayers do not correspond to a completely relaxed cubic structure, indicating that the epilayers are partially strained; 3) lattice mismatch varies for different regions, implying a complicated strain relaxation mechanism of 3C epilayers on various mesas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Powell, J. A., Neudeck, P. G., Trunek, A. J., Beheim, G. M., Matus, L. G., Hoffman, R. W. Jr, and Keys, L. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 1449 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Neudeck, P. G., Powell, J. A., Trunek, A. J., Huang, X. R., and Dudley, M., Materials Science Forum 389–393, 311 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Neudeck, P. G., Powell, J. A., Beheim, G. M., Benavage, E. L., Abel, P. B., Trunek, A. J., Spry, D. J., Dudley, M., and Vetter, W. M., J. Appl. Phys. 92, 2391 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Bowen, D. K. and Tanner, B. K., High Resolution X-ray Diffractometry and Topography (Taylor & Francis, 1998).Google Scholar
5. Tairov, Y. M. and Tsvetkov, V. F., Crystal Growth and Characterization of Polytype Structures, ed. Krishna, (Pergamon, 1983), pp. 111.Google Scholar
6. Bauer, A., Kräuβlich, J., Dressler, L., Kuschnerus, P., Wolf, J., Goetz, K., Käckell, P., Furthmüller, J., and Bechstedt, F., Phys. Rev. B 57, 2647 (1998)Google Scholar
7. Dudley, M., Vetter, W. M., and Neudeck, P. G., J. Cryst. Growth 240, 22 (2002).Google Scholar
8. Huang, X. R., Dudley, M., Neudeck, P. G., and Powell, J. A. (unpublished).Google Scholar
9. Fatemi, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 936 (2002).Google Scholar