Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:14:01.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scaling sorbent materials for real oil-sorbing applications and environmental disasters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2019

Andrew Patalano ,
Fabian Villalobos ,
Pedro Pena ,
Evan Jauregui ,
Cengiz Ozkan Open the ORCID record for Cengiz Ozkan [Opens in a new window]  and
Mihri Ozkan
Andrew Patalano*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA
Fabian Villalobos
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA
Pedro Pena
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA
Evan Jauregui
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA
Cengiz Ozkan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA
Mihri Ozkan
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to Andrew Patalano at [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

There are few feasible options for sorbents, which can be quickly manufactured and deployed in the event of a major oil spill and so every oil spill is an ecological disaster. This paper aims to provide an understanding of what a realistic, full-scale crude oil spill solution would look like based on the performance of the best sorbents currently available, their costs, and their advantages.

Adsorbent materials or “sorbents” described here have been a recent target for research toward applications in environmental cleanup, remediation, and hazardous material containment. These materials contain many compositions, syntheses, and practical manufacturing parameters that make most of them practically and logistically unfit to tackle quantities much larger than a single barrel of oil. Different properties of crude oil and nonpolar materials, such as their viscosity, density, and weathering, can also make these materials seem attractive on a lab scale but underperform in field testing and in practical applications. This review addresses the challenges, advantages, and disadvantages of different technical applications of the superior sorbent materials and material types in the literature. In addition, we discuss the different costs and manufacturing challenges of sorbent materials in real oil spills and what a feasible containment sorbent material might look like.

Keywords

environmentporosityadsorption
Type
Review Article
Information
MRS Energy & Sustainability , Volume 6 , 2019 , E3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Guard, U.C.: Coordinator Report Deepwater Horizon (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 2011).Google Scholar
Ivshina, I.B., Kuyukina, M.S., Krivoruchko, A.V., Elkin, A.A., Makarov, S.O., Cunningham, C.J., Peshkur, T.A., and Atlas, M.: Environmental science processes & impacts oil spill problems and sustainable response strategies through new technologies 33(0), 1201–1219 (2015).Google Scholar
Schrope, M.: Oil spill: Deep wounds. Nature 472, 152–154 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, M., Graham, L., Hale, C., Maung-Douglass, E., Sempier, S., Skelton, T., and Swann, L.: Oil spill science: Deepwater horizon-where did the oil go? 1–8 (2017). Available at: https://protect-eu.mimecast.com/s/pIaTCNOBOsNX6E1TRFv8t?domain=masgc.org.Google Scholar
Graham, L.J., Hale, C., Maung-douglass, E., and Sempier, S.: Chemical dispersants and their role in oil spill response (2016). Available at: https://protect-eu.mimecast.com/s/4-PVCOgDgsA4O0oUPQiLn?domain=masgc.org.Google Scholar
Walther, H.R.: Clean up Techniques Used for Coastal Oil Spills: An Analysis of Spills Occurring in Santa Barbara, California, Prince William Sound, Alaska, the Sea of Japan, and the Gulf Coast (University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 2014).Google Scholar
Oil Tanker Spill Statistics 2017, 2018.Google Scholar
Chang, S.E., Stone, J., Demes, K., and Piscitelli, M.: Consequences of oil spills: A review and framework for informing planning. Ecol. Soc. 19(2), 26 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodbody-Gringley, G., Wetzel, D.L., Gillon, D., Pulster, E., Miller, A., and Ritchie, K.B.: Toxicity of Deepwater Horizon source oil and the chemical dispersant, Corexit® 9500, to coral larvae. PLoS One 8(1), 1–10 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, D.D., George, W., Baum, H.R., Walton, W.D., and Kevin, B.: In situ burning of oil spills. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 106(1), 231–278 (2001).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korsh, J., Shen, A., Aliano, K., and Davenport, T.: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and breast cancer: A review of the literature. Breast Care 10(5), 316–318 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khordagui, H.: Environmental impact of the Gulf war: An integrated preliminary assessment. Environ. Manage. 17(4), 557–562 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, E., Mane, A.U., Libera, J.A., Elam, J.W., and Darling, S.B.: Advanced oil sorbents using sequential infiltration synthesis. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 2929–2935 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J.R. and Grubesic, T.H.: Oil spill modeling: Risk, spatial vulnerability, and impact assessment. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 42(1), 112–127 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, C.H., Paris, C.B., Perlin, N., Dornberger, L.N., Patterson, W.F. III, Chancellor, E., Murawski, S., Hollander, D., Daly, K., Romero, I.C., Coleman, F., and Perryman, H.: Impacts of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill evaluated using an end-to-end ecosystem model. PLoS One 13(1), e0190840 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, R.C., Boyle, K.J., Carson, R.T., Chapman, D., Michael, W., Kanninen, B., Kopp, R.J., Krosnick, J.A., List, J., Paterson, R., Presser, S., Smith, V.K., Tourangeau, R., Welsh, M., Wooldridge, J.M., Debell, M., Donovan, C., Konopka, M., and Scherer, N.: Putting a value on injuries to natural assets: The BP oil spill. Science 356(6335), 253–254 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabir, S.: Approach of cost-effective adsorbents for oil removal from oily water. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45(17), 1916–1945 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doshi, B., Sillanpää, M., and Kalliola, S.: A review of bio-based materials for oil spill treatment. Water Res. 135, 262–277 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Du, F., Huang, J., Duan, H., Xiong, C., and Wang, J.: Wetting transparency of supported graphene is regulated by polarities of liquids and substrates. Appl. Surf. Sci. 454(May), 249–255 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, D.: Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature 437(7059), 640–647 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dedov, A.G., Ivanova, E.A., Sandzhieva, D.A., Lobakova, E.S., Kashcheeva, P.B., Kirpichnikov, M.P., Ishkov, A.G., and Buznik, V.M.: New materials and ecology: Biocomposites for aquatic remediation. Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. 51(4), 617–630 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S., Xu, Q., Latthe, S.S., Gurav, A.B., and Xing, R.: Superhydrophobic/superoleophilic magnetic polyurethane sponge for oil/water separation. RSC Adv. 5(84), 68293–68298 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langevin, D., Poteau, S., Hénaut, I., and Argillier, J.F.: Crude oil emulsion properties and their application to heavy oil transportation. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 59(5), 511–521 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y. and Kujawinski, E.B.: Chemical composition and potential environmental impacts of water-soluble polar crude oil components inferred from esi FT-ICR MS. PLoS One 10(9), 1–18 (2015).Google ScholarPubMed
Meyer, R.F., Attanasi, E.D., and Freeman, P.A.: Heavy Oil and Natural Bitumen Resources in Geological Basins of the World (U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F.: Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pang, Y., Wang, S., Wu, M., Liu, W., Wu, F., Lee, P.C., and Zheng, W.: Kinetics study of oil sorption with open-cell polypropylene/polyolefin elastomer blend foams prepared via continuous extrusion foaming. Polym. Adv. Technol. 29(4), 1313–1321 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bay, H.: Design, Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Graphene-Based Nanoarchitectures for Sustainability (University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, 2015).Google Scholar
Bay, H.H., Patino, D., Mutlu, Z., Romero, P., Ozkan, M., and Ozkan, C.S.: Scalable multifunctional ultra-thin graphite sponge: Free-standing, superporous, superhydrophobic, oleophilic architecture with ferromagnetic properties for environmental cleaning. Sci. Rep. 6, 21858 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ethington, E.F.: Interfacial contact angle measurements of water, mercury, and 20 organic liquids on quartz, calcite, biotite, and Ca-montmorillonite substrates. United States Geol. Surv. 90–409(July), 1–18 (1990).Google Scholar
Shtein, Z. and Shoseyov, O.: When bottom-up meets top-down. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114(3), 428–429 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, L., Xu, L., Sun, Y., and Yang, N.: Robust and durable superhydrophobic polyurethane sponge for oil/water separation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55(43), 11260–11268 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbasi, Z., Shamsaei, E., Fang, X.Y., Ladewig, B., and Wang, H.: Simple fabrication of zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-8/polymer composite beads by phase inversion method for efficient oil sorption. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 493, 150–161 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suh, D.J., Park, T.J., Han, H.Y., and Lim, J.C.: Synthesis of high-surface-area zirconia aerogels with a well-developed mesoporous texture using CO2 supercritical drying. Chem. Mater. 14(4), 1452–1454 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jambeck, J.R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T.R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., Narayan, R., and Law, K.L.: Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347(6223), 768–771 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koelmans, A.A., Gouin, T., Thompson, R., Wallace, N., and Arthur, C.: Plastics in the marine environment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 33(1), 5–10 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohan, D., Sarswat, A., Ok, Y.S., and Pittman, C.U.: Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent—A critical review. Bioresour. Technol. 160(October), 191–202 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crini, G.: Review: A history of cyclodextrins. Chem. Rev. 114(21), 10940–10975 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, S., Dai, G., Yang, H., and Luo, Z.: Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis mechanism: A state-of-the-art review. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 62, 33–86 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adebajo, M.O., Frost, R.L., Kloprogge, J.T., Carmody, O., and Kokot, S.: Porous materials for oil spill cleanup: A review of synthesis. J. Porous Mater. 10, 159–170 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nam, C., Li, H., Zhang, G., and Chung, T.C.M.: Petrogel: New hydrocarbon (oil) absorbent based on polyolefin polymers. Macromolecules 49(15), 5427–5437 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Z., Gu, H., Chen, Q., He, Z., Xu, W., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Xiong, L., Zheng, L., and Feng, Y.: Macroporous monoliths with pH-induced switchable wettability for recyclable oil separation and recovery. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 534, 183–194 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, Q., Pan, Q., and Liu, F.: Facile removal and collection of oils from water surfaces through superhydrophobic and superoleophilic sponges. J. Phys. Chem. C 115(35), 17464–17470 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J. and Wang, H.: Ultra-hydrophobic and mesoporous silica aerogel membranes for efficient separation of surfactant-stabilized water-in-oil emulsion separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 212(November 2018), 597–604 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, D., McLaughlin, E., Pfeffer, R., and Lin, Y.S.: Adsorption of oils from pure liquid and oil-water emulsion on hydrophobic silica aerogels. Sep. Purif. Technol. 99, 28–35 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lv, X., Tian, D., Peng, Y., Li, J., and Jiang, G.: Superhydrophobic magnetic reduced graphene oxide-decorated foam for efficient and repeatable oil-water separation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 466(October 2018), 937–945 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Q., Oribayo, O., Feng, X., Rempel, G.L., and Pan, Q.: Synthesis of polyurethane foams loaded with TiO2 nanoparticles and their modification for enhanced performance in oil spill cleanup. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57(27), 8918–8926 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oribayo, O., Feng, X., Rempel, G.L., and Pan, Q.: Synthesis of lignin-based polyurethane/graphene oxide foam and its application as an absorbent for oil spill clean-ups and recovery. Chem. Eng. J. 323, 191–202 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, S., Dong, T., Xu, G., and Wang, F.: Oil spill cleanup by hydrophobic natural fibers. J. Nat. Fibers 14(5), 727–735 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidgoli, H., Mortazavi, Y., and Khodadadi, A.A.: A functionalized nano-structured cellulosic sorbent aerogel for oil spill cleanup: Synthesis and characterization. J. Hazard. Mater. 366(November 2018), 229–239 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Z., Saleem, J., Barford, J.P., Mckay, G., Wang, Z., Saleem, J., Barford, J.P., and Mckay, G.: Preparation and characterization of modified rice husks by biological delignification and acetylation for oil spill cleanup. Environ. Technol., 1–12 (2018). Available at: https://protect-eu.mimecast.com/s/TX-rCMZAZC5WJRGCJOnc6?domain=tandfonline.com.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhang, X., Wang, C., Chai, W., Liu, X., Xu, Y., and Zhou, S.: Kapok fiber as a natural source for fabrication of oil absorbent. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 92(7), 1613–1619 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, V., Kendall, R.J., Hake, K., and Ramkumar, S.: Crude oil sorption by raw cotton. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 6277–6281 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Y., Romain, C., and Williams, C.K.: Sustainable polymers from renewable resources. Nature 540(7633), 354–362 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Zhi, C., Wang, X., Tang, D., Xu, Y., Weng, Q., Jiang, X., Mitome, M., Golberg, D., and Bando, Y.: Three-dimensional strutted graphene grown by substrate-free sugar blowing for high-power-density supercapacitors. Nat. Commun. 4(May), 1–8 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, Q., Chu, Y., Wang, Z., Chen, N., Lin, L., Liu, F., and Pan, Q.: Robust superhydrophobic polyurethane sponge as a highly reusable oil-absorption material. J. Mater. Chem. A 1(17), 5386–5393 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ge, X., Yang, W., Wang, J., Long, D., Ling, L., and Qiao, W.: Flexible carbon nanofiber sponges for highly efficient and recyclable oil absorption. RSC Adv. 5(86), 70025–70031 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar