Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:01:30.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of Plasma Processing in Making Integrated Circuits and Flat-Panel Displays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

The ever-shrinking dimensions of microelectronic devices has mandated the use of plasma processing in integrated circuit (IC) factories worldwide. Today the plasma-processing industry has grown to over $3 billion in revenues per year, well in excess of predictions made only a few years ago. Plasma etching and deposition systems are also found throughout flat-panel-display (FPD) factories despite the much larger dimensions of thin-film transistors (TFTs) that are used to switch picture elements (pixels) on and off. Besides the use of plasma in etching and depositing thin films, other processes include the following: removal of photoresist remnants after development (descumming), stripping developed photoresist after pattern transfer (ashing), and passivating defects in polycrystalline material. Why are plasma processes so prevalent?

In etching, plasmas are used for high-fidelity transfer of the photolithographically defined pattern that defines the device or circuit. More generally, plasma provides the means to taper sidewalls. In Si processing, the sidewalls must be nearly vertical to obtain high density integration and faster performance. However in making FPDs, sidewalls are tapered to obtain uniform step coverage and reduce shorting. In deposition, plasmas are used to enable processing at low temperature. For both etching and deposition, only plasma processing provides an economically viable means for processing large area substrates: 300 mm for Si and more than 550 × 650 mm for FPDs. It is the ability to scale uniform reactant generation to larger areas that sets plasma apart from beam-based processes that might otherwise offer the desired materials modifications. The nonequilibrium characteristics of plasma further distinguish this processing method. Energetic electrons break apart reactant precursors while ions bombard the surface anisotropically.

Type
Plasma Processing of Advanced Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Proud, J., Gottscho, R.A., Bondur, J.A., Garscadden, A., Heberlein, J.V., Herb, G.K., Kushner, M.J., Lawler, J.E., Lieberman, M.A., Mayer, T.M., Phelps, A.V., Roman, W., Sawin, H.H., and Winters, H.F., Plasma Processing of Materials: Scientific Opportunities and Technological Challenges (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1991).Google Scholar
2.Lieberman, M.A., Selwyn, G., and Tuszewski, M., MRS Bulletin 20 (3) (1996).Google Scholar
3.Lieberman, M.A. and Lichtenberg, A.J., Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1994).Google Scholar
4.Morar, J.F., McFeely, F.R., Shinn, N.D., Landgren, G., and Himpsel, F.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 45 (1984) p. 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Coburn, J.W. and Winters, H.F., J. Appl. Phys. 50 (1979) p. 3189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Joubert, O., Oehrlein, G.S., and Surendra, M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 12 (1994) p. 665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Bailey, A.D. III, van de Sanden, M.C.M., Gregus, J.A., and Gottscho, R.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13 (1994) p. 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Howard, W.E., IBM J. Res. Dev. 36 (1992) p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Depp, S.W. and Howard, W.E., Sci. Am. 268 (1993) p. 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Korczynski, E., Solid State Technol. 39 (1996) p. 63.Google Scholar
11.Hishikawa, Y., Tsuda, S., Wakisaka, K., and Kuwano, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 73 (1993) p. 4227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Verdeyen, J.T., Beberman, J., and Overzet, L., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 8 (1990) p. 1851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Howling, A.A., Dorier, J-L., and Hollenstein, C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62 (1993) p. 1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Ashida, S., Lee, C., Shim, M.R., and Lieberman, M.A., Proc. Dry Process Symp. (The Electrochemical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1995) p. 21.Google Scholar
15.Gabriel, C.T. and McVittie, J.P., Solid State Technol. (June 1992) p. 81.Google Scholar
16.Samukawa, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 29 (1990) p. 980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Arnold, J.C. and Sawin, H.H., J. Appl. Phys. 70 (1991) p. 5314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Hashimoto, K., Hikosaka, Y., Hasegawa, A., and Nakamura, M., Proc. Dry Process Symp. (The Electrochemical Society of Japan, 1995) p. 17.Google Scholar
19.Gottscho, R.A., Jurgensen, C.W., and Vitkavage, D.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 10 (1992) p. 2133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Gottscho, R.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 11 (1993) p. 1884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Bailey, A.D. III and Gottscho, R.A., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 34 (1995) p. 2083.Google Scholar