Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:52:03.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unlubricated Sliding Behavior of Metals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

Scientists and engineers still debate the relative contributions of roughness and interlocking of asperities, adhesion and interatomic forces, and elastic and plastic deformation in friction phenomena. However a central point of agreement does exist: Friction involves energy dissipation, or the conversion of mechanical work into heat. Therefore any mechanism that allows for this energy dissipation during sliding interactions of materials deserves consideration, whether it occurs strictly at the nominal sliding interface or within material at some distance from that interface.

If the interactions are limited to atomic distances, it is entirely appropriate to focus attention on atoms at the two surfaces (see the articles by M.O. Robbins and J. Krim and J.A. Harrison and S.S. Perry in this issue). Friction is then a surface phenomenon. However if the sliding conditions lead to extensive plastic deformation of either material—over distances readily detectable by eye or by optical microscopy—then the associated energy dissipation is likely to account for most of the frictional losses. In such cases, friction involves more than processes occurring at the surface.

Type
Fundamentals of Friction
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Dowson, D., History of Tribology (Longman, London, 1979).Google Scholar
2.Rigney, D.A. and Hirth, J.P., Wear 53 (1979) p. 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Larsen-Basse, J., in ASM Handbook, vol. 18, edited by Blau, P. (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1992) p. 25.Google Scholar
4.Krim, J. and Chiarello, R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 9 (4) (1991) p. 2566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Rigney, D.A., in Wear of Engineering Materials, edited by Hawk, J. (ASM International, Materials Park, OH) in press.Google Scholar
6.Rigney, D.A., Naylor, M.G.S., Divakar, R., and Ives, L.K., Mater. Sci. Eng. 81 (1986) p. 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf, D., Scripta Mater. 36 (2) (1997) p. 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Wang, X.J. and Rigney, D.A., in Proc. Int. Tribology Congress, Yokohama 1995 (Japanese Society of Tribologists, Tokyo, 1996) p. 85.Google Scholar
9.Voce, E., J. Inst. Met. 74 (19471948) p. 537.Google Scholar
10.Rigney, D.A., Tribology Int. 30 (1997) p. 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Akagaki, T. and Rigney, D.A., Wear 149 (1–2) (1991) p. 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Landman, U., Luedtke, W.D., and Gao, J., Langmuir 12 (19) (1996) p. 4514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Belak, J.F., MRS Bulletin XVIII (5) (1993) p. 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.McClelland, G.M. and Glosli, J.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (13) (1993) p. 1960.Google Scholar
15.and, M.D. PerryHarrison, J.A., Langmuir 12 (19) (1996) p. 4552.Google Scholar
16.Holian, B.L., Lomdahl, P.S., and Zhou, S.J., Physica A 240 (1997) p. 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Smith, E.D., Robbins, M.O., and Cieplak, M., Phys. Rev. B 54 (11) (1996) p. 8252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Nosé, S., J. Chem. Phys. 81 (1994) p. 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Hoover, W.G., Phys. Rev. A 31 (1985) p. 1695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Holian, B.L., Voter, A.F., Wagner, N.J., Ravelo, R.J., Chen, S.P., Hoover, W.G., Hoover, C.G., Hammerberg, J.E., and Dontje, T., Phys. Rev. A 43 (6) (1991) p. 2655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Hammerberg, J.E., Holian, B.L., Roder, J., Bishop, A.R., and Zhou, S.J., Physica D in press.Google Scholar
22.Röder, J., Hammerberg, J.E., Holian, B.I., and Bishop, A.R., Phys. Rev. B in press.Google Scholar
23.Faber, T.E., Fluid Dynamics for Physicists (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar