Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:32:41.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surfaces, Interfaces, and Changing Shapes in Multilayered Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

It is generally recognized that the capillary forces associated with internal and external interfaces affect both the shapes of liquid-vapor surfaces and wetting of a solid by a liquid. It is less commonly understood that the same phenomenology often applies equally well to solid-solid or solid-vapor interfaces.

The fundamental quantity governing capillary phenomena is the excess free energy associated with a unit area of interface. The microscopic origin of this excess free energy is often intuitively simple to understand: the atoms at a free surface have “missing bonds”; a grain boundary contains “holes” and hence does not have the optimal electronic density; an incoherent interface contains dislocations that cost strain energy; and the ordering of a liquid near a solid-liquid interface causes a lowering of the entropy and hence an increase in the free energy. In what follows we shall show how this fundamental quantity determines the shape of increasingly complex bodies: spheres, wires, thin films, and multilayers composed of liquids or solids. Crystal anisotropy is not considered here; all interfaces and surfaces are assumed isotropic.

Consideration of the equilibrium of a spherical drop of radius R with surface free energy γ shows that pressure inside the droplet is higher than outside. The difference is given by the well-known Laplace equation:

This result can be obtained by equating work done against internal and external pressure during an infinitesimal change of radius with the work of creating a new surface.

Type
Mechanical Behavior of Nanostructured Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Cammarata, R.C., Prog. Surf. Sci. 46 (1994) p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Cahn, J.W., Acta Met. 28 (1980) p. 1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Josell, D., Acta Metall. Mater. 41 (1993) p. 2179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Udin, H., Shaler, A.J., and Wulff, J., Trans. AIME J. Met. 1 (1949) p. 186.Google Scholar
5.Udin, H., Trans. AIME J. Met. 3 (1951) p. 63.Google Scholar
6.Ruud, J.A., Witvrouw, A., and Spaepen, F., J. Appl. Phys. 74 (1993) p. 2517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Weissmüller, J. and Cahn, J.W., Acta Mater. 45 (1997) p. 1899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Josell, D. and Spaepen, F., Acta Metall. Mater. 41 (1993) p. 3017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Josell, D. and Wang, Z.L., in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties V, edited by Baker, S.P., Ross, C.A., Townsend, P.H., Volkert, C.A., and Børgesen, P. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 356, Pittsburgh, 1995) p. 357.Google Scholar
10.Josell, D. and Carter, W.C., in Creep and Stress Relaxation in Miniature Components, edited by Merchant, H.D. (The Minerals, Metals, & Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, 1997) p. 271.Google Scholar
11.Josell, D., Carter, W.C., and Bonevich, J.E., Proceedings of 4th Int. Conf. on Nanostructured Materials to be published in the journal of Nanostructured Materials. In press.Google Scholar
12.Swinkels, F.B. and Ashby, M.F., Acta Met. 29 (1981) p. 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Mullins, W.W., J. Appl. Phys. 28 (1957) p. 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.McMichael, R.D., Chen, P.J., and Egelhoff, W.F. Jr., IEEE Trans. Magn. 34 (1998) p. 897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Srolovitz, D.J. and Safran, S.A., J. Appl. Phys. 60 (1986) p. 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Josell, D., Coriell, S.R., and McFadden, G., Acta Metall. Mater. 43 (1995) p. 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Mullins, W.W., Acta Met. 6 (1958) p. 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar