Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T13:38:28.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies of Material Reactions by In Situ High-Resolution Electron Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Robert Sinclair
Get access

Extract

Processing has always been a key component in the development of new materials. Basic scientific understanding of the reactions and transformations that occur has obvious importance in guiding progress. Invaluable insight can be provided by observing the changes during processing, especially at high magnification by in situ microscopy. Now that this can be achieved at the atomic level by using high-resolution electron microscopy (HREM), atomic behavior can be seen directly. Accordingly, many deductions concerning reactions in materials at the atomic scale are possible.

The purpose of this article is to illustrate the level reached by in situ HREM. The essential procedure is to form a high-resolution image of a standard transmission electron microscope (TEM) sample and then to alter the structure by some means in a controlled manner, such as by heating. Continual recording on videotape allows subsequent detailed analysis of the behavior, even on a frame-by-frame (1/30 second) basis. The most obvious advantage is to follow the atomic rearrangements directly in real time. However, in addition, by continuous recording no stages in a reaction are missed, which can often occur in a series of conventional ex situ annealed samples because of the limited number of samples that can realistically be examined by HREM. One can be sure that the same reaction, in the same area, is being studied. Furthermore, by changing the temperature systematically, extremely precise kinetic measurements can be made (e.g., for activation energies and kinetic laws) and the whole extent of a material transformation can be investigated in one sample, something that would take months of work if studied conventionally. The information provided by in situ HREM is often unique and so it can become an important technique for fundamental materials investigations.

Type
Materials Science in the Electron Microscope
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 19 , Issue 6 , June 1994 , pp. 26 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Sinclair, R., Yamashita, T., Parker, M.A., Kim, K.B., Holloway, K., and Schwartzman, A.F., Acta Crystallogr. Sec. A 44 (1988) p. 965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Sinclair, R., Parker, M.A., and Kim, K.B., Ultramicroscopy 23 (1987) p. 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ko, D.H. and Sinclair, R., Ultramicroscopy (1994) in press.Google Scholar
4.Gibson, J.M., McDonald, M., and Unterwald, F.C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) p. 1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Lu, P. and Smith, D.J., Surf. Sci. 254 (1991) p. 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Iijima, S. and Ichihashi, T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) p. 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Smith, D.J., Petford-Long, A.K., Wallenberg, L.R., and Bovin, J.O., Science 233 (1986) p. 872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Sinclair, R., Morgiel, J., Kirtikar, A.S., Wu, I.W., and Chiang, A., Ultramicroscopy 51 (1993) p. 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Guillemet, J.P., de Manduit, B., Pieraggi, B., Sinclair, R., and Konno, T.J., Proc. Xlllth ICEM (1994) in press.Google Scholar
10.Batstone, J.L., Philos. Mag. A67 (1993) p. 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Clemens, B.M. and Sinclair, R., MRS Bulletin XV (2) (1990) p. 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Holloway, K. and Sinclair, R., J. Less Common Met. 140 (1988) p. 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Tanaka, H., Konno, T.J., and Sinclair, R., in Advanced Metallization for Devices and Circuits— Science, Technology, and Manufacturability, edited by Murarka, S.P., Katz, A., Tu, K.N., and Maex, K. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 377, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994) in press.Google Scholar
14.Kirtikar, A.S. and Sinclair, R., in Advanced Metallization and Processing for Semiconductor Devices and Circuits II, edited by Katz, A., Murarka, S.P., Nissim, Y.I., and Harper, J.M.E. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 260, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993) p. 227.Google Scholar
15.Howe, J.M., Proc. 49th Annu. Meeting Electron Microscopy Soc. Am., edited by Bailey, G.W. (1991) p. 450.Google Scholar
16.Konno, T.J. and Sinclair, R., Philos. Mag. B66 (1992) p. 749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Konno, T.J. and Sinclair, R., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 134 (1993) p. 173.Google Scholar
18.Konno, T.J. and Sinclair, R., in Phase Transformations in Thin Films Thermodynamics and Kinetics, edited by Atzmon, M., Greer, A.L., Harper, J.M.E., and Libera, M.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 311, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993) p. 99.Google Scholar
19.Konno, T.J. and Sinclair, R., submitted for publication.Google Scholar
20.Hayzelden, C. and Batstone, J.L., J. Appl. Phys. 73 (1993) p. 8279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Lairson, B.M., Visokay, M.R., Marinero, E.E., Sinclair, R., and Clemens, B.M., J. Appl. Phys. 74 (1993) p. 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Hashimoto, H., Takai, Y., Yokota, Y., Endo, H., and Fukuta, E., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 19 (1980) p. L1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Sinclair, R., Ponce, F.A., Yamashita, T., Smith, D.J., Camps, R.A., Freeman, L.A., Erasmus, S.J., Nixon, W.C., Smith, K.C.A., and Catto, C.J.D., Nature 298 (1982) p. 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Goringe, M.J. and Hutchison, J.L. (1994) submitted for publication.Google Scholar
25.Saka, H.et al. (1994) submitted for publication.Google Scholar