Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:07:08.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiation Effects in Ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

Ceramics are inorganic, nonmetallic materials, a class that includes solids with both crystalline and glassy (i.e., aperiodic) atomic structures. This article will emphasize radiation effects in conventional refractory oxide ceramics and glasses that display high-temperature strength, chemical inertness, and high electrical resistivity. The introduction to this issue cites various radiation environments to which materials may be exposed; a number of these environments receive mention in this article. However emphasis here is on giving the reader an overview of damage mechanisms and of the changes in key physical properties (optical, thermal, electrical, and mechanical) that can affect the behavior of these materials. The broad subject of radiation-damage phenomena in ceramics has recently been reviewed by Hobbs et al.

Even at low doses of energetic radiation, whether particulate or electromagnetic, isolated atomic-level defects may be generated and can offer the potential to induce changes in physical properties. However for some applications such as fission reactors, fusion reactors (now in the conceptual design stages), and high-energy accelerators, one must deal with high fluences capable of generating relatively large damage aggregates such as dislocation loops and voids. Thus one must understand the evolution of damage microstructures from point defects to aggregates in both model materials and engineering ceramics. Even when induced changes are only electronic in nature, the effects on some properties (e.g., electrical conductivity) can be dramatic. In the following sections, evolution of the damage state and consequent changes in key properties are described, with some attention to the often critical role of impurities.

Type
Materials Performance in a Radiation Environment
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Hobbs, L.W., Clinard, F.W. Jr., Zinkle, S.J., and Ewing, R.C., J. Nucl. Mater. 216 (1994) p. 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Bridges, F., Davies, G., Robertson, J., and Stoneham, A.M., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2 (1990) p. 2875.Google Scholar
3.Henderson, B. and King, R.K., Philos. Mag. 13 (1966) p. 1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Agullo-Lopez, F., Catlow, C.R.A., and Townsend, P.D., Point Defects in Materials (Academic Press, London, 1988).Google Scholar
5.Levy, P.W., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 52 (1991) p. 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Crawford, J.H., J. Nucl. Mater. 108–109 (1982) p. 644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Evans, B.D. and Staplebroek, M., Phys. Rev. 18 (1978) p. 7089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Pells, G.P. and Perks, J., unpublished.Google Scholar
9.Pells, G.P. and Gilbert, C.R., Cryst. Latt. Defects Amorph. Mater. 17 (1987) p. 1.Google Scholar
10.Pells, G.P., Murphy, M.J., Cullen, F.L., and Agnew, P., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2 (1990) p. 9257.Google Scholar
11.Griscom, D.L., Radiation Effects in Optical Materials (SPIE vol. 541, 1985) p. 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Stoneham, A.M. and Smith, L.W., Defects and Impurities in Glasses Relevant for Radiation Response (AEA-InTec-0206, October 1990).Google Scholar
13.Bibler, N.E. and Howitt, D.G. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 25, 1988) p. 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Berman, R., Foster, E.L., and Rosenberg, H.M., “The Thermal Conductivity of Irradiated Dielectric Crystals at Low Temperature,” in Report on Bristol Conf. on Defects in Crystalline Solids (Phys. Soc., London, 1955) p. 321.Google Scholar
15.Klemens, P.G., Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Phys. Res. B 229 (1984) p. 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Dienst, W., Rhode, M., and Schulz, B., 5th IEA Workshop on Radiation Effects in Ceramic Insulators, Clearwater, FL, November 20, 1991.Google Scholar
17.Fowler, J., R. Soc. London, Ser. A 236 (1956) p. 464.Google Scholar
18.Rose, A., Phys. Rev. 97 (1955) p. 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Rose, A., “Concepts in Photoconductivity and Allied Probems,” in Interscience Tracts on Physics and Astronomy, vol. 19 (John Wiley & Sons, New York and London, 1963).Google Scholar
20.Pells, G.P., J. Nucl. Mater. 184 (1991) p. 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Hodgson, E.R., Cryst. Latt. Defects Amorph. Mater. 18 (1989) p. 169.Google Scholar
22.Kesternich, W., Scheurerman, F., and Zinkle, S.J., J. Nucl. Mater. 206 (1993) p. 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Morono, A. and Hodgson, E.R., J. Nucl. Mater. 233–237 (1996) p. 1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Pells, G.P., J. Nucl. Mater. 184 (1991) p. 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Moslang, A., Daum, E., and Lindau, R., presented at 18th Symp. on Fusion Technology, Karlsruhe, August 22-26, 1994.Google Scholar
26.Pells, G.P. and Hodgson, E.R., J. Nucl. Mater. 226 (1995) p. 286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Morono, A. and Hodgson, E.R., in press.Google Scholar
28.Pells, G.P., Buckley, S.N., Agnew, P., Foreman, A.J.E., Murphy, M.J.M., and Staunton-Lambert, S.A.B., Report No. AERE-R-13222, AERE Harwell, 1988.Google Scholar
29.Pells, G.P. and Hill, G.J., J. Nucl. Mater. 141–143 (1986) p. 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Frost, H.M. and Clinard, F.W., J. Nucl. Mater. 155–157 (1988) p. 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Heidinger, R. and Koniger, F., J. Nucl. Mater. p. 344.Google Scholar
32.Heidinger, R., Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids 119–121 (1991) p. 861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Wilks, R.S., J. Nucl. Mater. 26 (1968) p. 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Dienst, W., J. Nucl. Mater. 191–194 (1992) p. 555.Google Scholar
35.Pells, G.P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77 (1994) p. 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Clinard, F.W. Jr., Hurley, G.F., Youngman, R.A., and Hobbs, L.W., J. Nucl. Mater. 133–134 (1985) p. 701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Zhu, Z. and Jung, P., J. Nucl. Mater. 212–215 (1994) p. 1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Pells, G.P., Boothby, R.M., and Sowden, B.C., AEAT Harwell Report No. AEA-TSD-1021 (1995).Google Scholar