Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:49:58.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterned Polymer Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Anna C. Balazs ,
Chandralekha Singh ,
Ekaterina Zhulina ,
Dilip Gersappe  and
Galen Pickett
Get access

Extract

Polymer films that contain well-defined patterns can be used in a variety of novel applications. For example such films can serve as the scaffolding in fabricating organic/inorganic composites with controlled architectures. One means of forming patterned films is to anchor the ends of homopolymers onto a substrate (so that the ends are fixed and cannot move) and immerse the system in a poor solvent. The incompatibility between the polymer and solvent drives the system to phase-separate. Since the ends are immobilized however, the polymers can only escape the unfavorable solvent by clustering with neighboring chain s into distinct aggregates or “pinned micelles.” These micelles have a uniform size and spacing, and form a regular array on the surface. In this article, we use theoretical models to extend this concept and show that, by tethering copolymers—chains that contain more than one type of monomer—we can drive the system to form more complicated surface patterns. These copolymer patterns provide a handle for engineering the interaction between surfaces and thus facilitate the fabrication of novel optical devices. If the copolymer films are composed of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic domains, the surface can also be used as a template for growing biological cells with tailored shapes and sizes.

Type
Theory and Simulation of Polymers at Interfaces
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 16 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Aksay, I.A.et al., Science 273 (1996) p. 892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Larsen, A. and Grier, D.G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) p. 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Singhvi, R.et al., Science 264 (1994) p. 696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Klushin, L.I. (unpublished).Google Scholar
5.Lai, P-Y. and Binder, K., J. Chem. Phys. 97 (1992) p. 586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Yeung, C., Balazs, A.C., and Jasnow, D., Macromolecules 26 (1993) p. 1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Huang, K. and Balazs, A.C., Macromolecules 26 (1993) p. 4736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Williams, D.R.M., J. Phys. II France 3 (1993) p. 1313.Google Scholar
9.Grest, G.S. and Murat, M., Macromolecules 26 (1993) p. 3108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Soga, K.G., Guo, H., and Zuckermann, M.J., Europhys. Lett. 29 (1995) p. 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. The size of the micelles is determined by a balance between the entropic losses due to the stretching of the chains to form these aggregates and the energetic gain due to the mutual shielding of the chains from the poor solvent.Google Scholar
12.Siqueira, D.F., Kohler, K., and Stamm, M., Langmuir 11 (1995) p. 3092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Zhao, W., Krausch, G., Rafailovich, M., and Sokolov, J., Macromolecules 27 (1994) p. 2933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.O'Shea, S.J., Welland, M.E., and Rayment, T., Langmuir 9 (1993) p. 1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Stamouli, A., Pelletier, E., Koutsos, V., van der Vegte, E., and Hadziioannou, G., Langmuir 12 (1996) p. 3221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Zhulina, E. and Balazs, A.C., Macromolecules 29 p. 2667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Zhulina, E., Singh, C., and Balazs, A.C., Macromolecules 29 (1996) p. 6338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Zhulina, E., Singh, C., and Balazs, A.C., Macromolecules 29 (1996) p. 8254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Singh, C. and Balazs, A., “Interactions Between Polymer-Coated Surfaces in Poor Solvents: II. Surfaces Coated with AB Diblock Copolymers”, Macromolecules in press.Google Scholar
20.Singh, C., Zhulina, E., Gersappe, D., Pickett, G., and Balazs, A.C., Macromolecules (1996) p. 7637.Google Scholar
21.Huang, K. and Balazs, A.C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) p. 620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Israels, R., Gersappe, D., Fasolka, M., Roberts, V.A., and Balazs, A.C., Macromolecules 27 (1994) p. 6679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Singh, C. and Balazs, A.C., J. Chem. Phys. 105 (1996) p. 706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Singh, C., Pickett, G., and Balazs, A.C., Macromolecules 29 (1996) p. 7559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Fleer, G., Cohen-Stuart, M.A., Scheutjens, J.M. H.M., Cosgrove, T., and Vincent, B., Polymers at Interfaces (Chapman & Hall, London, 1993).Google Scholar
26.Zhulina, E.B., Birshtein, T.M., Priamitsyn, V.A., and Klushin, L.I., Macromolecules 28 (1995) p. 8612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. In the plot, H is scaled by the lateral size of the pinned micelle formed by non-bridging chains, and ΔF is scaled by the free energy per chain for nonbridging micelles.Google Scholar
28.Hadziioannou, G. (private communication).Google Scholar
29.Gersappe, D., Zhulina, E., and Balazs, A.C., “Interactions Between Free Chains and Pinned Micelles” (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
30. In the case of a planar, penetrable interface, the amount of adsorbed diblock is also significantly greater than that for the alternating copolymer (see Reference 31).Google Scholar
31.Gersappe, D. and Balazs, A.C., Phys. Rev. E 52 (1995) p. 5061; Y. Lyatskaya, D. Gersappe, N. Gross, an d A.C. Balazs, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) p. 1449.Google Scholar