Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:20:33.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling Bicycle-Rider Vibrations: Implications for Materials Selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

Over the past several years, the number of materials routinely employed for the fabrication of major bicycle components (e.g., frame, fork, and handlebar) has increased from one (steel) to at least five (steel, aluminum, titanium, fiber-reinforced polymers, and magnesium). Historically the primary driving force for implementation of new materials in bicycle manufacture has been the almost fanatical desire to reduce the weight of the bicycle. Although weight reduction of the bicycle will continue to be important, an old design paradigm—driven mostly by the recent popularity of bicycles designed to be ridden off-road (mountain bikes)—has re-emerged: the design of bicycles that minimize the amount of road/trail shock transmitted to the rider.

Type
Materials For Sports
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Salvendy, G., ed., Handbook of Human Factors (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
2.Hertz, J., Krogh, A., and Palmer, R.G., Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computations (Addison-Wesley, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Dempster, W.T., WADC Technical Report No. 555–159 (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, 1955).Google Scholar
4.Smith, C.C., McGehee, D.Y., and Healy, A.J., J. Dyn. Sys. Meas. Control 100 (1978) p. 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar