Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:31:35.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Materials Challenges in Integrated Optical Recording Heads

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

Integrated optical recording head concepts show promise for future light-weight and compact optical heads. Several fundamental issues remain to be explored before fully integrated optical heads. become a reality. This article reviews the basic operating principles of integrated optic heads, focusing on the materials challenges inherent in developing both partially and fully integrated optical heads.

Currently available optical mass storage systems provide a feature unavailable in magnetic direct access storage devices (DASD) — removable and interchangeable media. At present, however, this feature is bought at a price, with magnetic storage devices currently outperforming their optical counterparts in access speed and volumetric storage density. The access time of optical drives is greater than 40 ms, compared to the 10–20 ms typical of magnetic DASD. This is, in large part, a consequence of the 50–100 g moving mass of the optical head. The optical head also limits the maximum volumetric storage density, with current heads ranging from about 0.5 cm to more than 2 cm in height.

Type
Optical Storage Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Burke, J.J. and Ryan, B., BYTE 14 (1989) p. 259.Google Scholar
2.Ura, S., Suhara, T., Nishihara, H., and Koyama, I., J. Lightwave Tech. LT-4 (1986) p. 913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Sunagawa, H., Ura, S., Suhara, T., and Nishihara, H., in International Symposium on Optical Memory ISOM'87 Technical Digest (1987) p. 247.Google Scholar
4.Ura, S., Suhara, T., Nishihara, H., and Koyama, I., Electron. and Commun. in Jpn. Part 2 70 (1987) p. 1.Google Scholar
5.Ura, S., Suhara, T., and Nishihara, H., Appl. Opt. 26 (1987) p. 4777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Walter, D.I. and Houghton, I., Thin Solid Films 52 (1978) p. 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Miyanaga, S., Asakura, T., and Imai, M., Optical and Quantum Electron. 11 (1980) p. 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Ulrich, R. and Weber, H.P., Appl. Opt. 11 (1972) p. 428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Heitmann, D. and Ortiz, C., IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-17 (1981) p. 1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Wuthrich, A. and Lukosz, W., Appl. Phys. 21 (1980) p. 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Lukosz, W. and Tiefenthaler, K., Opt. Lett. 8 (1983) p. 537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Ohno, M., Yamada, T., and Kurokawa, T., J. Appl. Phys. 57 (1985) p. 2951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Heuberger, K. and Lukosz, W., Appl. Opt. 25 (1986) p. 1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Weller-Brophy, L.A., Roncone, R.R., Dunckel, W., Weisenbach, L., and Zelinski, B.J.J., in Optical Data Storage Center Quarterly Report, December 15, 1989 (Optical Sciences Center, Universiry of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona) (unpublished).Google Scholar
15.Narayanamurti, V., Science 235 (1987) p. 1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Akiyama, M., Kawarda, Y. and Kaminishi, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 23 (1984) p. L843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Soga, T., Hattori, S., Sakai, S., Takeyasu, M. and Umeno, M., Electron. Lett. 20 (1984) p. 916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Dupuis, R.D., Bean, J.C., Brown, J.M., Macrander, A.T., Miller, R.C. and Hopkins, L.C., J. Electron. Mater. 16 (1987) p. 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Dupuis, R.D., van der Ziel, J.P., Logan, R.A., Brown, J.M., and Pinzone, C.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50 (1987) p. 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Yao, Y., Okada, Y., Kawanami, H., Matsui, S., Imagawa, A. and Ishida, K., in Heteroepitaxy on Si II, edited by Fan, J.C.C., Philips, J.M. and Tsaur, B-Y. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 91, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987) p. 63.Google Scholar
21.Atwater, H.A., Thompson, C.V., Smith, Henry I. and Geis, M.W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 43 (1983) p. 1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Smith, Henry I., Geis, M.W., Thompson, C.V. and Atwater, H.A., J. Crystal Growth 63 (1983) p. 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Chemla, D.S. and Ayss, I., Nonlinear Optical Properties of Organic Molecules and Crystals, Vol. 1, Part II, Chapter II-I (Academic Press, Orlando, 1987) p. 23.Google Scholar
24.Lytel, R., Lipscomb, G.F., Stiller, M., Thackara, J.I., and Ticknor, A.J., in Organic Materials for Non-Linear Optics, edited by Hann, R.A. and Bloor, D. (Royal Society of Chemistry, Burlington House, London, 1989) p. 382.Google Scholar
25.Uhlrich, D.R., in Organic Materials for Non-Linear Optics, edited by Hann, R.A. and Bloor, D. (The Royal Society of Chemistry, Burlington House, London, 1989) p. 241.Google Scholar