Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:18:18.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immobilization Science of Cement Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

D.E. Macphee  and
F.P. Glasser
Get access

Extract

Portland cement and Ca(OH)2, “slaked lime,” are representative of a family of materials that have conceptual and practical advantages as matrices for the immobilization of wastes. These are relatively proven construction materials with an extensive history of use in various ground-water regimes, and in various climates. The raw materials are widely available and they exhibit a reasonable amount of resistance to physical damage and attrition. They are also durable. Although modern Portland cements are only about 150 years old, numerous examples of Roman concrete made from slaked lime and volcanic pozzolanic ash survive; the Pantheon in Rome (circa A.D. 300) continues in regular use.

Satisfactory immobilization matrices can also be formed by incorporating other artificial waste materials, e.g. coal combustion fly ash, blast furnace slag, and natural materials such as calcined kaolin or siliceous volcanic ashes containing glass and zeolites. These materials react with Ca(OH)2 and cement to become an integral part of a cement matrix. Thus one waste (ash, slag) can be used to help immobilize another, and may actually improve the retentive capacity of a cementitious matrix.

Since cements require water to harden, they are tolerant of wet wastes and are especially useful for many effluents. In addition, they are low-cost, nonflammable materials with the potential to provide chemical and physical immobilization of wastes, but their set characteristics can be affected by certain material additions. Table I balances some advantages against disadvantages of the use of cement systems for waste immobilization.

Type
Advanced Cement-Based Materials
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , March 1993 , pp. 66 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Lea, F.M., Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, 3rd ed. (Edward Arnold, 1982) p. 221.Google Scholar
2.McCarthy, G.J., Hassett, D.J., and Bender, J.A., in Advanced Cementitious Systems: Mechanisms and Properties, edited by Glasser, F.P., Pratt, P.L., Mason, T.O., Young, J.F., and McCarthy, G.J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 245, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) p. 129.Google Scholar
3.Matsuda, M., Proc. Joint. Intl. Waste Man. Conf. (Seoul, 1991).Google Scholar
4.Nishi, T., Mitsuda, M., Chino, K., and Kikuchi, M., Cem. Concr. Res. 22 (1992) p. 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Angus, M., PhD thesis, Aberdeen University, 1985.Google Scholar
6.Cochet, G., Cem. Concr. Res. 22 (1992) p. 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Cochet, G. and Cariou, B., Cem. Concr. Res. 22 (1992) p. 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Macphee, D.E., Adv. Cem. Res. 3 (1990) p. 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Cowie, J. and Glasser, F.P., Adv. Cem. Res. 4 (1991/1992) p. 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Mollah, M.Y.A., Tsai, Y-N., and Cocke, D.L., J. Environ. Health, A27 (1992) p. 1213.Google Scholar
11.Cartledge, F.K., Butler, L.G., Chalasani, D., Eaton, H.C., Frey, F.P., Herrera, E., Tittlebaum, M.E., and Yang, S-L., Environ. Sci. Technol. 24 (1990) p. 867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Cocke, D., Ortego, J.D., McWhinney, H., Lee, K., and Shukla, S., Cem. Concr. Res. 19 (1989) p. 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Herrera, E., Tittlebaum, M., Cartledge, F., and Eaton, H., J. Environ. Health A27 (1992) p. 983.Google Scholar
14.Federal Register 51 21672-92 (No. 114, June 13, 1986).Google Scholar
15.Tamas, F.D., Csetenyi, L., and Tritthart, J., Cem. Concr. Res. 22 (1992) p. 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Ortego, J.D., Barroeta, Y., Cartledge, F.K., and Akhter, H., Environ. Sci. Technol. 25 (1991) p. 1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Thomas, N.L., Jameson, D.A., and Double, D.D., Cem. Concr. Res. 7 (1977) p. 283.Google Scholar
18.Ivey, D.G., Heimann, R.B., Neuwir, M., Shumborski, H.S., Conrad, D., Mikula, R.J., and Lam, W.W., J. Mater. Sci. 25 (1990) p. 5055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Poon, C.S. and Perry, R., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products: Characterization, Utilization, and Disposal HI, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P., Roy, D.M., and Diamond, S. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 86, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987) p. 67.Google Scholar
20.Tashiro, C. and Kawaguchi, K., Cem. Concr. Res. 7 (1977) p. 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Tashiro, C., Takahashi, H., Kanaya, M., Hirakida, I., and Yoshida, R., Cem. Concr. Res. 7 (1977) p. 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Zamorani, E., Brambilla, G., Serrini, G., Toussaint, N., and Cazzaniga, E., Cem. Concr. Res. 22 (1992) p. 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Nishimura, T., Itoh, C.T., and Tozawa, K., in Arsenic Metallurgy, Fundamentals and Applications, edited by Reddy, R.G., Hendrix, J.L., and Queneau, P.B. (The Metallurgical Society, Warrendale, PA, 1987) p. 77.Google Scholar
24.Kyle, J.H. and Lunt, D., Proc. Conf. Extractive Metallurgy (Perth, October 1991).Google Scholar
25.Robins, R.G., in Arsenic Metallurgy Fundamentals and Applications, edited by Reddy, R.G., Hendrix, J.L., and Queneau, P.B. (The Metallurgical Society, Warrendale, PA, 1987) p. 99.Google Scholar
26.Boylan, G., Hegerhorst, K., and Macphee, D.E., unpublished work.Google Scholar
27.Akhter, H. and Cartledge, F., Abstr. 4th Amer. Chem. Cong., ENVR 34 (1991).Google Scholar
28.McWhinney, H.G., Rowe, M.W., Cocke, D.L., Ortego, J.D., and Yu, G-S., J. Environ. Health A25 (1990) p. 463.Google Scholar
29.Atkins, M., Glasser, F.P., and Moroni, L., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV, edited by Abrajano, T. Jr. and Johnson, L.H. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 212, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991) p. 373.Google Scholar
30.Pourbaix, M., Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions (Pergamon Press, 1966) p. 209.Google Scholar
31.Glasser, F.P., Rahman, A.A., Macphee, D.E., Angus, M.J., and Atkins, M., Rept. DOE/RW/85.189 UK, Dept. Environ. (November 1985).Google Scholar
32.Atkins, M., Bennett, D., Dawes, A., Glasser, F., Kindness, A., and Read, D., A Thermodynamic Model for Blended Cements, Rept. DOE/HMIP/RR/92/005 UK, Dept. Environ. (December 1991).Google Scholar