Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:21:15.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Grass Phytoliths for Archaeological Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

The word phytolith means “plant rocks.” Phytoliths are mineral deposits that form in and between plant cells. Any mineral deposit may be considered a phytolith, although most recent research has focused on opaline silica. Silica seems to be widespread in at least some plant families and is resistant to dissolution in a pH less than 9. Silica phytoliths therefore have the potential to be useful microfossils that can be helpful in the documentation of prehistoric environment and economy.

Identifiable shapes rather than amorphous deposits are a necessary characteristic for useful microfossils. Several plant families have long been known to be consistent accumulators of identifiable silica bodies: Gramineae (grass), Cyperaceae (sedge), and Equisetaceae (horsetail). Phytoliths from the Gramineae are especially well known; specialized silica-accumulating cells produce distinctively shaped phytoliths. However, other families have also been shown to produce significant amounts of identifiable phytoliths. Ulmaceae (elm), Fabaceae (bean), Cucurbitaceae (squash), and Compositae (sunflower) are a few examples of dicotyledonous families that commonly produce phytoliths. Some families, such as the Labiatae (mint), have yielded little or no identifiable phytoliths to date. However, further study may indicate phytolith production in particular species.

Type
Microscopic Analysis in Archaeology
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Rovner, I., in Advances in Method and Theory, Vol. 6, edited by Schiffer, M. (Academic Press, New York, 1983) p. 225266.Google Scholar
2.Metcalfe, C.R., Anatomy of the Monocotyledons I. Gramineae (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1960).Google Scholar
3.Metcalfe, C.R., Anatomy of the Monocotyledons V. Cyperaceae (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1971).Google Scholar
4.Loveling, T.S., Geol. Soc. of Amer. Bull. 70 (1959) p. 781800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Piperno, D.R., Phytolith Analysis: An Archaeological and Geological Perspective (Academic Press, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
6.Jones, R.L., J. Paleontol. 38 (1964) p. 773775.Google Scholar
7.Twiss, P.C., Suess, E., and Smith, R.M., Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings 33 (1969) p. 109115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Fredlund, G.G., Johnson, W.C., and Dort, W. Jr., A Preliminary Analysis of Opal Phytoliths from the Eustis Ash Pit, Frontier County, Nebraska (Institute for Tertiary Quarternary Studies, TER-QUA Symposium Series 1, 1985) p. 147162.Google Scholar
9.Brown, D.A., Journal of Archaeological Science 11 (1984) p. 345368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Bombin, M., PhD thesis, University of Alberta, 1984.Google Scholar
11. Dinan, E. and Pearsall, D.M., “The University of Missouri Phytolith Classification System,” presented at The Third Phytolith Research Workshop, University of Missouri, 1988.Google Scholar
12.Mulholland, S.C. and Rapp, G. Jr., “A General Phytolith Classification Emphasizing Grass Silica-Bodies,” presented at the Third Phytolith Research Workshop, Columbia, MO, 1988 (unpublished).Google Scholar
13.Mulholland, S.C., PhD thesis, University of Minnesota, 1987.Google Scholar
14.Ollendorf, A.L., Mulholland, S.C., and Rapp, G. Jr., Annals of Botany 61 (1988) p. 2090214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Pearsall, D.M., Science 199 (1978) p. 177178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Piperno, D.R., American Antiquity 49 (1984) p. 361383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Pearsall, D.M. and Trimble, M.K., J. Archaeol. Sci. 11 (1984) p. 119133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Turner, B.L. II and Harrison, P.D., Science 213 (1981) p. 399405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Rosen, A.M., presented at the Society for American Archaeology, 48th Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, Program and Abstracts (1983), p. 92.Google Scholar
20.Schreve-Brinkman, E.J., Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 25 (1978) p. 1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Piperno, D.R., Antiquity 59 (1985) p. 1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar