Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:54:34.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Petrographic Analysis of Archaeological Ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

S. Terry Childs
Get access

Extract

Petrographic analysis is not new to the study of archaeological ceramics, but it is receiving more attention as it is applied to interesting and diverse archaeological problems. Petrography was developed by geologists to identify minerals in rocks. Archaeologists use it to study the minerals that occur in prehistoric clay matrices transformed by heat to a rocklike state.

Petrographic analysis requires a polarizing microscope and a piece of ceramic, called a thin section, 30 microns (0.03 mm) thick. As light from this specialized microscope passes through a mineral, it produces optical properties unique to that mineral. Birefringence and pleochroism are two such properties used to identify minerals, while physical properties such as cleavage and relief are also important discriminators. Several references fully explain these properties and relate them to specific minerals and rocks.

Using petrographic techniques, as many as five materials can be studied in a ceramic—the clay itself, natural inclusions in the clay, purposefully added inclusions, and glazes or slips on the clay surface. Under certain conditions the clay or inclusions may melt and a fifth material, glass, may form. Depending on the research problem to be addressed and the samples available, the petrdgrapher studies one or more of these materials.

Type
Microscopic Analysis in Archaeology
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , March 1989 , pp. 24 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Shepard, A., Plumbate, a Mesoamerican Trad Ware, Publication 573 (Carnegie Institution, Washington, 1948).Google Scholar
2.Ceramics for the Archaeologist, Publication 609 (Carnegie Institution, Washington, 1965).Google Scholar
3.Hallimond, A.F., The Polarizing Microscope, 3rd ed. (Vickers Ltd., York, 1970).Google Scholar
4.Bloss, F.D., An Introduction to the Methods of Optical Crystallography (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1961).Google Scholar
5.Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987).Google Scholar
6.Kerr, P., Optical Mineralogy, 4th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1977).Google Scholar
7.Deer, W., Howie, R., and Zussman, J., An Introduction to the Rock Forming Minerals (Essex: Longman, 1966).Google Scholar
8.MacKenzie, W. and Guilford, C., Atlas of Rock-Forming Minerals in Thin Section (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1980).Google Scholar
9.Oates, J., Davidson, T., Kamilli, D. and McKerrell, , “Seafaring Merchants of Ur?” Antiquity 51 (1977) p. 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Rice, P., “Continuity and Change in the Valley of Guatemala: A Study of Whiteware Pottery Production,” unpublished PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University, 1976.Google Scholar
11.Childs, S.T., “Style in Technology: A View of the Early Iron Age Iron Smelting Technology Through its Refractory Ceramics,” unpublished PhD thesis, Boston University, 1986.Google Scholar
12.Arnold, D., “Mineralogical Analysis of Ceramic Materials from Quinua, Department of Ayacucho, Peru,” Archaeometry 14(1) (1972) p. 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Rye, O., “Keeping Your Temper under Control: Materials and the Manufacture of Papuan Pottery,” Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania 11(2) (1976) p. 106–137.Google Scholar
14.Stimmell, C., Heimann, R., and Hancock, R., “Indian Pottery from the Mississippian Valley: Coping with Raw Materials,” Archaeological Ceramics, edited by Olin, J. and Franklin, A. (Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, Press, 1982).Google Scholar
15.DeAtley, S., “Mix and Match: Traditions of Glaze Paint Preparation at Four Mile Ruin, Arizona,” in Ceramics and Civilization, Vol. 2. of Technology and Style, edited by Kingery, D. (American Ceramic Society, Ohio, 1986).Google Scholar
16.Childs, S.T., “Refractory Clay Selection for African Iron Smelting Technologies: Replicative and Experimental Approaches,” in Pottery Technology: Ideas and Approaches, edited by Bronitsky, G. (Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1989).Google Scholar
17.Hutchison, C., Laboratory Handbook of Petrographic Techniques (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974).Google Scholar
18.Schmidt, P., Historical Archaeology: A Structural Approach in an African Culture (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, 1978).Google Scholar
19.Schmidt, P. and Avery, D., “More Evidence for an Advanced Prehistoric Iron Technology in Africa,” in J. Field Archaeology 10(4) (1983) p. 421–434.Google Scholar
20.Schmidt, P. and Childs, S. T., “Innovation and Industry During the Early Iron Age in East Africa: The KM2 and KM3 Sites of NW Tanzania,” African Archaeological Rev. 3 (1985) p. 53–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.de Maret, P., Fouilles Archeologiques dans la vallèe du Haut-Lualaba, Zaire, II, Sanga and Katongo, 1974. Tervuren: Annales du Musèe royal de l'Afrique centrale, Sciences Humaines, Vol. 120.Google Scholar