Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:48:01.057Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How to translate materials science concepts into K–12 student outreach activities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2011

Eric D. Marshall*
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, NY 10504, USA; [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

As the complexity of global materials science challenges increases, so does the need for materials science and engineering literacy and career recruitment. Many funding agencies are addressing this by including requirements for achieving broader impacts (e.g., National Science Foundation grants, European Commission Framework), and resources have been created from a variety of sources to help. This article addresses the issue of how to translate materials science concepts into K–12 outreach activities, with an emphasis on how to use the human, physical, and information resources available. Researchers may best reach their outreach objectives by distilling content rather than diluting it, connecting on a human level, highlighting the true nature of science, not reinventing the wheel, being a role model, and having fun. Initiatives that support outreach efforts are referenced and include examples from the Materials Research Society.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Fenicheland, M., Schweingruber, H.A., Surrounded by Science: Learning Science in Informal Environments (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009).Google Scholar
2.Clark, C.M., Thoughtful Teaching (Teachers College Press, New York, NY, 1995).Google Scholar
3.Bednar, A.K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T.M., Perry, J.D., in Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation, Duffy, T.M., Jonassen, D.H., Eds. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1992), pp. 23.Google Scholar
4.Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J., Coulson, R.L., in Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation, Duffy, T.M., Jonassen, D.H., Eds. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1992), pp. 65.Google Scholar
5.Jonassen, D.H., in Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation, Duffy, T.M., Jonassen, D.H., Eds. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1992), pp. 132.Google Scholar
6.Hicklin, T., Science Communication Workshop Helps Scientists Explain Research with Passion, Clarity; www.bnl.gov/today/story.asp?ITEM_NO=1714.Google Scholar
7.Energy Research Project with Local Focus (TryScience, New York Hall of Science, 2008); www.powerupthegame.org/downloads/pdfs/lesson6.pdf.Google Scholar
8.Brandt, R., Lampert, M., On Making Sense: A Conversation with Magdalene Lampert (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1994); www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/feb94/v0151/num05/[email protected].Google Scholar
10.St. John, M., End Paper: The Value of Knowing What You Do Not Know (National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 2000); www.nsf.gov/pubs/2000/nsf99148/ch_13.htm.Google Scholar
11.Rogoff, B., Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context (Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1990), pp. 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.What Makes Learning Fun? (Selinda Research Associates, Chicago, IL, 2007); www.selindaresearch.com/learning.htm.Google Scholar
19.Patterson, M.M., Marshall, E.D., Wade, C.G., Nucci, J.A., Dunham, D.J., Eds., Materials Education, MRS Symp. Proc. 1233 (Materials Research Society, Warrendale, PA, 2009).Google Scholar