Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:11:28.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Engineered Porous Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

Rustum Roy recently observed that, operating from a finite number of elements, materials science faces an over-supply problem, too many scientists, and too few elements. Like all Malthusian dilemmas, relief is unlikely within the assumptions. Materials scientists, however, enjoy opportunities to develop new materials through morphological engineering of traditional substances. Carbon, after all, provided a century of progress for polymer chemists and a revolution in the manufacturing world. The trend from atomic- to molecular- to chain-level engineering can obviously be extended to mesostructure engineering and beyond. The tailoring of porosity is an example of such an extension.

This issue of the MRS Bulletin examines the concept of engineered porosity from three perspectives. Smith, Hua, and Earl discuss characterization based on classic gas adsorption and more recent NMR and scattering methods. Two articles, one by Harold and Lee, and the other by Fain, look at the pore structure requirements for important applications, reactive separations and gas separation. Finally, the materials science of engineered porosity is discussed in four articles. Even describes emulsion-derived foams in which surface-active species impose micron-scale structure that is retained during polymerization. Shapovalov broadly reviews methods to introduce porosity in metals. Durian discusses recent work on relaxation phenomena in aqueous foams. Finally, I review the factors that control structure in mesoporous aerogels.

Type
Engineered Porous Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Roy, R., Materials Technology 8 (1993) p. 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.LeMay, J.D., Hopper, R.W., Hrubesh, L.W. and Pekala, R., MRS Bulletin xv (12) (1990) p. 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Aubert, J.H. and Sylwester, A.P., CHEMTECH 21 (1991) p. 290.Google Scholar
4.Aubert, J.H. and Sylwester, A.P., CHEMTECH 21 (1991) p. 234.Google Scholar
5.Gregg, S.J. and Sing, K.S.W., Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity (Academic Press, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
6.Sing, K.S.W., Everett, D.H., Haul, R.A.W., Moscou, L., Pierotti, R.A., Rouquerol, J., and Siemieniewska, T., Pure and Applied Chemistry 57 (1985) p. 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Aubert, J.H. and Clough, R.L., Polymer 26 (1985) p. 2047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Schaefer, D.W., Engineered Porous Materials EXPO ′93, Conference Report, SAND93-2096 (1993). Available from National Technical Information Service, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161.Google Scholar
9.DOE Office of Industrial Programs, The DOE Industrial Energy Program: Research and Development in Separation Technology, DOE/NBM-8002773 (1987). Available from National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commece, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161.Google Scholar
10.Palmer, J.K., Fain, D.E., and Vance, J.M., Program Plan for Inorganic Membrane Technology Transfer, unpublished report K/Qt-384 (1990). Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN.Google Scholar
11.Johnson, H.E. and Schulman, B.L., Assessment of the Potential for Refinery Applications of Inorganic Membrane Technology-An Identification and Screening Analysis, DOE/FE61680-H3 (1993). Available from National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield VA 22161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Department of Energy, Office of Transportation Materials, Lightweight Materials for Transportation, ORNL/ATD-75 (1993). Available from National Technical Information Service, U. S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161.Google Scholar
13.Mayer, S.T., Pekala, R.W., and Kaschmitter, J.L., J. Electrochem. Soc. 140 (1993) p. 446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Delnick, E.M., Ingersoll, D., and Firsich, D., in Third International Seminar on Double Layer Capacitors and Similar Energy Storage Devices, Deerfield Beach, FL, edited by Wolsky, S.P. and Marincic, N. (Unpublished Proceedings, 1993).Google Scholar
15.Delnick, F.M., in Electrochemical Society Proceedings, edited by Scherson, D. (Electrochemical Society, Cleveland, Ohio, 1994).Google Scholar
16.Dahn, J.R., Fong, R., and Spoon, M.J., Phys. Rev. B 42 (1990) p. 6426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.O'Regan, B. and Gratzel, M., Nature 353 (1991) p. 737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Baker, R.W., Cussler, E.L., Eykamp, W., Koros, W.J., Riley, R.L., and Strathmann, H., Membrane Separation Systems-A Research Needs Assessment, DOE/ER/30133-H1 (1991). Available from National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.Google Scholar
19.Fain, D.E., personal communication, 1993.Google Scholar
20.Schaefer, D.W., Bunker, B.C., and Wilcoxon, J.P., Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 423 (1989) p. 35.Google Scholar
21.Lu, X., Arduini-Schuster, M.C., Kuhn, J., Nilsson, O., and Fricke, J., Science 255 (1992) p. 971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Pekala, R.W. and Kong, F.M., Polymer Preprints 30 (1989) p. 221.Google Scholar
23.Hurd, A.J., Critical Reviews in Surface Chemistry 2 (1993) p. 135.Google Scholar