Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:53:56.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Atomic-Level Disorder at Solid Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

The importance of interface materials is based largely on their inherent inhomogeneity, i.e., that the chemical composition and physical properties at or near an interface can differ dramatically from those of the nearby bulk material. For example, the propagation of a crack along an interface — rather than through the surrounding bulk material — indicates a different mechanical strength near the interface. Also, the elastic response and thermal behavior near an interface can be highly anisotropic in an otherwise isotropic material, and can differ by orders of magnitude from those of the adjacent bulk regions. Typically, these gradients extend over only a few atomic distances.

Because relatively few atoms control the properties in the interfacial region, the inherent difficulty in the experimental investigation of buried interfaces is actually an advantage in the atomic-level study of solid interfaces by means of computer-simulation techniques. While the limitations of such simulations are well known, this article will attempt to demonstrate the unique insights they can provide on some aspects of the mechanical behavior of both buried and thin-film interfaces. While to date, relatively little simulation work has focused directly on the observation of crack extension, we will discuss two types of phenomena with particular relevance in the fracture behavior of interface materials, namely their elastic and high-temperature properties. We will conclude with an outlook, too optimistic perhaps, on how the complementary capabilities of continuum-elastic theory, atomic-level computer simulation, and experiment could (and probably should) be combined in a new strategy for tackling the difficult problem of interface fracture to elucidate the underlying complex interplay between elasticity, plasticity, and temperature.

Type
Interfaces Part II
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Wolf, D., Acta Metall. 37 (1989) p. 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Wolf, D., Lutsko, J.F., and Kluge, M., in Atomistic Simulation of Materials, edited by Vitek, V. and Srolovitz, D.J. (Plenum Press, New York, 1989) p. 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Kluge, M., Wolf, D., Lutsko, J.F., and Phillpot, S.R., J. Appl. Phys. 67 (1990) p. 2370; D. Wolf and M. Kluge, Scr. Metall. 24 (1990) p. 907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Wolf, D. and Lutsko, J.F., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) p. 12; J. Mater. Res. 4 (1989) p. 1427.Google Scholar
5.Schuller, I.K., IEEE 3985 Ultrasonics Symposium, edited by McAvoy, B.R. (IEEE, New York, 1985) p. 1903; M. Grimsditch, in Brillouin Scattering from Metallic Superlattices, edited by M. Cardona and G. Guntherodt (Springer, Heidelberg, 1990).Google Scholar
6.Wolf, D., Mater. Sci. Eng. A126 (1990) p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Wolf, D. and Lutsko, J.F., J. Appl. Phys. 66 (1989) p. 1961; D. Wolf, Acta-Scr. Met. Proc. Series 4 (1990) p. 52; Surf. Sci. 225 (1990) p. 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Phillpot, S.R. and Wolf, D., Scr. Metall. 24 (1990) p. 1109; J.A. Jaszczak, S.R. Phillpot, and D. Wolf, J. Appl. Phys. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Cahn, R.W., Nature 323 (1986) p. 668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Ubbelohde, A.R., The Molten State of Matter: Melting and Crystal Structure (Wiley, Chichester, 1978); M. Born and K. Huang, Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices (Oxford, London, 1962).Google Scholar
11.Stillinger, F.H. and Weber, T.A., Phys. Rev. B 31 (1985) p. 5262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Broughton, J.Q. and Li, X.P., Phys. Rev. B 35 (1987) p. 9120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Lutsko, J.F., Wolf, D., Yip, S., Phillpot, S.R. and Nguyen, T., Phys. Rev. B 38 (1988) p. 11, 572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Phillpot, S.R., Lutsko, J.F., Wolf, D., and Yip, S., Phys. Rev. B 40 (1989) p. 2831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Phillpot, S.R., Yip, S., and Wolf, D., in Computers in Physics (Nov./Dec. 1990) p. 20.Google Scholar
16.Kluge, M.D. and Ray, J.R., Phys. Rev. B 39 (1989) p. 1738; M.H. Grabow, G.H. Gilmer, and A.F. Bakker in Molecular Dynamics Studies of Silicon Solidification and Melting, (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.) 141, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989) p. 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Lutsko, J.F., Wolf, D., Phillpot, S.R., and Yip, S., Phys. Rev. B 40 (1989) p. 2841; J.F. Lutsko and D. Wolf, Scr. Metall. 22 (1988) p. 1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Hsieh, T.E. and Balluffi, R.W., Acta Metall. 37 (1989) p. 1637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Daeges, J., Gleiter, H., and Perepezko, J.H., Phys. Lett. A 119 (1986) p. 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Wolf, D., Okamoto, P.R., Yip, S., Lutsko, J.F., and Kluge, M.D., J. Mater. Res. 5 (1990) p. 286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Meng, W.J., Okamoto, P.R., Thompson, L.J., Kestel, B.J., and Rehn, L.E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53 (1988) p. 1820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Yip, S. and Wolf, D., Mater. Sci. Forum 46 (1989) p. 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Erdogan, F., ASME J. Appl. Mech. 52 (1985) p. 823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Cheung, K.S., PhD thesis, MIT (1990), to be published.Google Scholar