Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:31:03.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defects in Intermetallic Compounds: How Do They Differ From Those in Ordinary Metals?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

Just as in ordinary metals, defects in intermetallic compounds fall into three basic categories: point defects (vacancies, substitutional and interstitial atoms), line defects (dislocations), and planar defects (stacking faults, interfaces, grain boundaries). Also like ordinary metals, many important physical and chemical properties of intermetallic compounds are governed by the presence of these defects and the effects on them from temperature, composition, chemical environment, elastic stress state, and so on.

What ultimately distinguishes an intermetallic compound from ordinary metals is its superlattice crystal structure. A two-dimensional analogue of the actual three-dimensional superlattice structure is shown in Figure 1a where the superlattice (unit cell marked by full lines) is made up of two identical sublat-tices (unit cells marked by dotted lines). A property of the sublattice is that it is exclusively occupied by one atom species, and accordingly sublattices are named after the atoms that occupy them, for example, the A and B sublattices in Figure 1a. In three dimensions, a super-lattice may consist of several sublattices. For example, the L12 superlattice of Ni3Al consists of four interpenetrating cubic sublattices, one occupied by Al atoms (Al sublattice), the other three by Ni atoms (Ni sublattices). When the sub-lattices are occupied exclusively by their designated atoms, the crystal is said to be fully ordered. The crystal will be partially ordered if a certain fraction of the sublattice sites is taken up by atoms that would otherwise sit at other sublattices; this fraction is used to describe the degree of long-range order.

Type
Technical Features
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Westbrook, J.H. and Fleischer, R.L., eds., Intermetallic Compounds: Principles and Practice (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1995).Google Scholar
2.Elcock, E.W. and McCombie, C.W., Phys. Rev. 109 (1958) p. 605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Koiwa, M., in Proc. NATO Advanced Res. Workshop on Ordered Intermetallics, edited by Liu, C.T., Cahn, R.W., and Sauthoff, G., (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Irsee, 1991) p. 449.Google Scholar
4.Girifalco, L.A., in Diffusion (ASM, Metals Park, Ohio, 1973) p. 185.Google Scholar
5.Hancock, G.F. and McDonnell, B.R., Phys. Status Solidi A 4 (1971) p. 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Whittenberger, J.D., J. Mater. Sci. 22 (1987) p. 394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Pascoe, R.T. and Newey, C.W., Metal Sci. J. 2 (1968) p. 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Wood, D.L. and Westbrook, J.H., Trans. AIME 224 (1962) p. 1,024.Google Scholar
9.Kear, B.H. and Wilsdorf, H.G.F., Trans. AIME 224 (1962) p. 382.Google Scholar
10.Yoo, M.H., Acta Metall. 35 (1987) p. 1,559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Takeuchi, S. and Kuramoto, E., Acta Metall. 21 (1973) p. 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Paidar, V., Pope, D.P., and Vitek, V., Acta Metall. 32 (1984) p. 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Hirsch, P.B., Phil. Mag. 65A (1992) p. 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Saada, G. and Veyssiere, P., Philos. Mag. 66 (1992) p. 1,081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Sun, Y.Q., in Reference 1.Google Scholar
16.Saada, G. and Veyssiere, P., Phys. Status Solidi B 172 (1992) p. 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Sun, Y.Q., Acta Metall, in press.Google Scholar
18.Chou, C.T. and Hirsch, P.B., Proc. R. Soc. London A387 (1983) p. 91.Google Scholar
19.Sun, Y.Q., Philos. Mag. 65A (1992) p. 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar