Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:12:28.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aqueous Alteration of Nuclear Waste Glasses and Metal Package Components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

The United States is at an important crossroads in its management of high-level radioactive waste (HLW). It is presently in the process of changing over from a strategy that was developed during World War II, which involves storing HLW in a relatively mobile liquid form, to a strategy of the 1990s, which involves removing and isolating potentially harmful radionuclides and immobilizing them into solid and inert forms, more specifically, borosilicate glass. The resulting waste glass products will then be permanently disposed of by deep burial, within stable geologic formations, where they become one element of a multibarrier waste-isolation system. This barrier system is designed to retain radionuclides so they can be permanently isolated from the public and from the accessible environment. Important contributing factors to the success of this strategy include the excellent stability and technical performance of waste glass forms and the ability of the glass, as well as waste package materials, to retain radionuclides even when exposed to potential leachants within a repository environment.

Type
Environmental Stability of Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Wicks, G.G., in Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, Glass IV 26, edited by Tomozawa, M. and Doremus, R.H. (Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1985) p. 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Wicks, G.G. and Bickford, D.F., High Level Radioactive Waste—Doing Something About It, DP-1777 (Savannah River Laboratory, Aiken, SC, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Uhlmann, D.R., in Ceramic and Glass Radioactive Waste Forms, CONF-770102, (Energy Research and Development Administration, 1977) p. 121.Google Scholar
4.Mendel, J.E., A Review of Leaching Test Methods and the Leachability of Various Solid Media Containing Radioactive Wastes, BNWL-1765 (Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Wicks, G.G., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 84 (1986) p. 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Wicks, G.G., in Corrosion of Glass, Ceramics, and Ceramic Superconductors, edited by Clark, D.E and Zoitos, B.K. (Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1992) p. 218.Google Scholar
7.Clark, D.E., Pantano, C.G., and Hench, L.L., Corrosion of Glass (Magazines for Industry Inc., New York, 1979).Google Scholar
8.Wicks, G.G. and Molecke, M.A., in Advances in Ceramics: Nuclear Waste Management II, edited by Clark, D.E., White, W.B., and Machiels, A.J. (Am. Ceram. Soc. Symp. Proc. 20, Westerville, OH, 1986) p. 657.Google Scholar
9.Wicks, G.G. and Molecke, M.A., presented at the Environmental and Waste Management Issues in the Ceramic Industry Symposium, American Ceramic Society, April 19–22, 1993, Cincinnati, OH, to be published in proceedings (1993).Google Scholar
10.Testing of High-Level Waste Forms Under Repository Conditions, edited by McMenamin, T., Proceedings of Workshop in Cadarache, France, October 17–21, 1988, EUR 12017 EN, Commission of the European Communities (1989).Google Scholar
11.Testing of High-Level Waste Forms and Package Components, edited by McMenamin, T., Proceedings of Workshop in Corsendonk, Belgium, October 10–17, 1992, Commission of the European Communities, in press (1993).Google Scholar
12.Jercinovic, M.S., Kaser, S., and Ewing, R.C., in Testing of High-Level Waste Forms Under Repository Conditions, EUR 12017 EN, edited by McMenamin, T., Commission of the European Communities Workshop Proc. (1989) p. 183.Google Scholar
13.Vernaz, E. and Godon, N., in Testing of High-Level Waste Forms Under Repository Conditions, EUR 12017 EN, edited by McMenamin, T., Commission of the European Communities Workshop Proc. (1989) p. 81.Google Scholar
14.Harker, A.B., Flintoff, J.F., and Howitt, D.G., in Testing of High-Level Waste Forms Under Repository Conditions, EUR 12017 EN, edited by McMenamin, T., Commission of the European Communities Workshop Proc. (1989) p. 152.Google Scholar
15.Wicks, G.G., Lodding, A.R., Macedo, P.B., and Clark, D.E., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XV, edited by Sombret, C.G. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 257, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) p. 119.Google Scholar
16.Tacca, J.A. and Wicks, G.G., in Ceramic Transactions: Nuclear Waste Management III, edited by Mellinger, G.B. (Am. Ceram. Soc. Symp. Proc. 9, Westerville, OH, 1990) p. 271.Google Scholar
17.Clark, D.E, presented at the Workshop on Testing of High-Level Waste Forms and Package Components, Corsendonk, Belgium, October 10–17, 1992, Commission of the European Communities, to be published (1993).Google Scholar
18.Lodding, A.R., Engstrom, E.U., Clark, D.E., and Wicks, G.G., in Ceramic Transactions: Nuclear Waste Management III, edited by Mellinger, G.B. (Am. Ceram. Soc. Symp. Proc. 9, Westerville, OH, 1990) p. 317.Google Scholar
19.Lodding, A.R., Clark, D.E., Engström, E.U., Odelius, H., Schumacher, M., Wicks, G.G., and Zoitos, B.K., in Ceramics Today—Tomorrow's Ceramics, edited by Vincenzini, P. (Elsevier, New York, 1991) p. 3121.Google Scholar
20.Lodding, A.R., presented at the Workshop on Testing of High-Level Waste Forms and Package Components, Corsendonk, Belgium, October 10–17, 1992, Commission of the European Communities, in press (1993).Google Scholar
21.Sassoon, R.E., Gong, M., Brandys, M., Adel-Hadadi, M., Barkatt, A., and Macedo, P.B., in Ceramic Transactions: Nuclear Waste Management III, edited by Mellinger, G.B. (Am. Ceram. Soc. Symp. Proc. 9, Westerville, OH, 1990) p. 307.Google Scholar
22.Brandys, M., Gong, M., Sassoon, R.E., Barkatt, A., and Macedo, P.B., in Ceramic Transactions: Nuclear Waste Management III, edited by Mellinger, G.B. (Am. Ceram. Soc. Symp. Proc. 9, Westerville, OH, 1990) p. 287.Google Scholar
23.Wallace, R.M. and Wicks, G.G., in Scientific-Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VI, edited by Brookins, D.C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 15, Elsevier, New York, 1983) p. 23.Google Scholar
24.Pescatore, C. and Machiels, A.J., in Advances in Ceramics, edited by Wicks, G.G. and Ross, W.A. (Am. Ceram. Soc. Symp. Proc. 8, American Ceramic Society, Columbus, OH, 1984) p. 508.Google Scholar
25.Chambre, P.L., Kang, C.H., Lee, W.W.L., and Pigford, T.H., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, edited by Apted, M.J. and Westerman, R.E. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 112, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987) p. 285.Google Scholar
26.Grambow, B. and Strachan, D.M., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, edited by Apted, M.J. and Westerman, R.E. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 112, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987) p. 713.Google Scholar
27.Plodinec, M.J., Jantzen, C.M., and Wicks, G.G., in Advances in Ceramics, Wicks, G.G. and Ross, W.A. (Am. Ceram. Soc. Symp. Proc. 8, American Ceramic Society, Columbus, OH, 1984) p. 491.Google Scholar
28.Sorensen, N.R. and Molecke, M.A., presented at the Workshop on Testing of High-Level Waste Forms and Package Components, Corsendonk, Belgium, October 10–17, 1992, Commission of the European Communities, in press (1993).Google Scholar