Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-06T14:25:57.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

1986 Von Hippel Lecture: The Many-Body Approach to Materials Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Minko Balkanski
Minko Balkanski*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physique des Solides de l'Université Pierre et Marie Curie, associè au CNRS
Get access

Extract

I would like to express my gratitude to the Awards Committee and its chairman for bringing me here today. One of the effects, and not the least, of this award is to call on my earliest recollections from the United States. In the Fall of 1956, I arrived in Boston at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) as a postdoctoral fellow in the laboratory of Prof. von Hippel. My stay in the Materials Research Laboratory of MIT was a determining influence in my future work.

The many-body problem is the study of the effects of interaction between bodies on the behavior of a many-body system. The importance of the many-body problem derives from the fact that almost any real physical system is composed of a set of interacting particles. Another essential aspect is that the many-body problem is not a branch of solid-state or atomic or nuclear physics but deals with general methods applicable to all many-body systems.

Because of the complexity of the many-body problem, one of the preferred solutions is simply to ignore it. One can always say, “Let us admit that the particles forming the system do not interact or that their interaction is so weak that the effect can be considered negligible.” In many cases, this method produced good results, and one of the great mysteries is why.

Type
Special Features
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 1987 , pp. 36 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Breit, G. and Wigner, E., Phys. Rev. 49 (1936) p. 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Fano, U., Phys. Rev. 124 (1961) p. 1866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Balkanski, M., Jain, K.P., Beserman, R., and Jouanne, M., Phys. Rev. B12 (1975) p. 4328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Balkanski, M., Jouanne, M., and Scagliotti, M., Invited lecture at the 10th International Conference on Raman Spectroscopy (Eugene, 1986).Google Scholar
5.Scagliotti, M., Jouanne, M., Balkanski, M., and Ouvrard, G., Solid State Commun. 54 (1985) p. 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Jouanne, M., Kanehisa, M.A., Morhange, J.F., Ravindra, N.M., and Balkanski, M., Invited Communication at the International Conference on Heavy Doping and the Metal. Insulator Transition in Semiconductors (Santa Cruz, 1984), Solid State Electronics 28 (1985) p. 39.Google Scholar
7.Ouvrard, G., Brec, R., and Rouxel, J., Mat. Res. Bull. 20 (1985) p. 1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Fiem, G. Le, Brec, R., Ouvrard, G., Louisy, A., and Segransan, P., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 43 (1982) p. 455; and K. Okudaa, K. Kurosawa, and S. Saito in High Field Magnetism, edited by M. Date (1983) p. 55.Google Scholar