Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:59:52.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Voltammetric Hysteresis Behavior and Potential Scan Rate Dependence of a Dye Sensitized Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2019

T. M. W. J. Bandara*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
L. Ajith DeSilva
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of West Georgia, Carrollton, GA30118, USA
K. Vignarooban
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Jaffna, Jaffna40000, Sri Lanka
S. L. N. Senavirathna
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Jaffna, Jaffna40000, Sri Lanka
R. Luminda Kulasiri
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Kennesaw State University, Marietta Campus, Marietta, GA30144, USA
*
*corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The voltammetric hysteresis visible in current density versus solar cell potential (J-V) curves is a serious concern because it is known that the performance of Dye-sensitized Solar Cells (DSCs) depends on the direction of the potential and the rate of scan. J-V characteristics of gel electrolyte based DSCs were obtained by varying the scan rate from 0.01 to 0.1 V s-1 and the direction from forward bias to reverse bias and reverse bias to forward bias. Three electrolytes were tested, two of them were 100% single salt electrolytes of KI and Hex4NI, and the other was a mixed salt electrolyte containing KI (75%) and Hex4NI (25%). DSC containing mixed salts electrolyte exhibited higher efficiency than single salt electrolytes. The energy conversion efficiency with mixed salts increased from 5.9 to 6.4% with the increase of the scan rate from 0.01 to 0.1 V s-1, when the scanning was conducted from forward bias to reverse bias direction. However, when the scanning was carried out with revised polarity a drop of the efficiency was observed with increasing rate of potential scan. Present work emphasizes the importance of reporting the rate and direction of potential scan along with solar cell performance parameters.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

O’Regan, B., Grätzel, M., Nature, 353, 737-740 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazeeruddin, M.K., De Angelis, F., Fantacci, S., Selloni, A., Viscardi, G., Liska, P., Ito, S., Takeru, B., Grätzel, M., Journal of the American Chemical Society, 127, 16835-16847 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nogueira, A.F., Longo, C., De Paoli, M.A., Chemistry Reviews, 248 , 1455-1468 (2005).Google Scholar
Khan, MZ, Al-Mamun, MR, Halder, PK, Aziz, MA. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 71 , 602-17 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazeeruddin, M.K., Baranoff, E., Gratzel, M., Sol. Energy, 85, 11721178 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jena, A., Mohanty, S.P., Kumar, P., Naduvath, J., Gondane, V., Lekha, P., Das, J., Narula, H.K., Mallick, S., Bhargava, P., Transactions of the Indian Ceramic Society, 71 , 1-16 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, J., Liang, J., Sumathy, K., Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 16 , 5848-5860 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boschloo, G., Hagfeldt, A., Accounts of Chemical Research, 42 , 1819-1826 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar