Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T12:49:42.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance Improvement of Graphenic Carbon X-ray Transmission Windows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2016

Sebastian Huebner ,
Natsuki Miyakawa ,
Andreas Pahlke  and
Franz Kreupl
Sebastian Huebner*
Affiliation:
Department of Hybrid Electronic Systems, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich, Germany
Natsuki Miyakawa
Affiliation:
Ketek GmbH, Hofer Str. 3, 81737 Munich, Germany
Andreas Pahlke
Affiliation:
Ketek GmbH, Hofer Str. 3, 81737 Munich, Germany
Franz Kreupl
Affiliation:
Department of Hybrid Electronic Systems, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich, Germany
*
*(Email: [email protected])

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Graphenic carbon (GC) x-ray transmission windows for EDX and XRF applications with a high transparency for x-rays below 2.5 keV have been fabricated on 6 inch wafers with a CMOS-compatible CVD process. GC windows with an open diameter of 7.4 mm and a thickness of 770 nm withstand up to 6.5 bars of differential pressure. A high transmissivity of 40 % for fluorine Kα (0.677 keV) radiation is demonstrated for a GC thickness of 650 nm. The GC membranes outperform beryllium (Be) windows, in terms of higher x-ray transmission and better mechanical stability while avoiding the toxicity of Be. Optical profilometry has been employed to visualize a large deformation of the GC layer during the window fabrication. This seems to limit the thickness of the GC windows that can currently be fabricated. A two-step growth process can overcome these limitations and windows with a thickness of up to 6 µm have been realized.

Keywords

x-ray fluorescenceCthin film
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 1 , Issue 20: Nanomaterials and Synthesis , 2016 , pp. 1441 - 1446
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

References

REFERENCES

Huebner, S., Miyakawa, N., Kapser, S., Pahlke, A., and Kreupl, F., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 62 (2), 588 (2015).Google Scholar
Huebner, S., Miyakawa, N., Pahlke, A., and Kreupl, F., Phys. Status Solidi B 252 (11), 2564 (2015).Google Scholar
Scholze, F. and Procop, M., X-Ray Spectrom. 34 (6), 473 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torma, P. and Sipila, H., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 60 (2), 1311 (2013).Google Scholar
Kreupl, F., MRS Proceedings 1303, mrsf10-1303-y02-01-b2-0 (2011)Google Scholar
Henke, B. L., Gullikson, E. M., and Davis, J. C., At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 54, (2), 181 (1993).Google Scholar
Blakslee, O. L., Proctor, D. G., Seldin, E. J., Spence, G. B., and Weng, T., J. Appl. Phys. 41 (8), 3373 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, C. A., J. Appl. Phys. 88 (9), 5487 (2000).Google Scholar