Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:49:25.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oxygen Monitor to Study Vascularization of Medical Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2020

Avid Najdahmadi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA
Rachel Gurlin
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA
Mellonie Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA
Jonathan RT Lakey
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA
Elliot Botvinick*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA
*
(Email: [email protected])

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Prevascularized medical devices can improve cell therapy. Such devices may replace whole organ transplantation with hosting only the necessary therapeutic cells. We have developed a noninvasive optical technology to study the vascularization into such medical devices. In our technique, oxygen partial pressure within a device is monitored by Oxygen Sensitive Tubes (OSTs), comprising oxygen permeable silicone tubing with inner luminal surfaces coated by an oxygen-sensitive porphyrin dye. OSTs were placed within a PDMS device and transplanted into the subcutaneous space of athymic nude mice. An optical probe placed over the skin excites the OSTs with a pulse of light and detects the luminescent lifetime of emitted light, which is uniquely related to oxygen partial pressure. Furthermore, we developed a Dynamic Inhalation Gas Test (DIGT) to determine the oxygen transport rate between the microvasculature and the device. DIGT works by monitoring oxygen partial pressure in a device following a step change in inhaled-gas oxygen content. We report DIGT oxygen dynamics measured intermittently over eight weeks. Our study shows DIGT dynamics are unique to each implant, supporting the important role of the host tissue response in the availability of oxygen over time.

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020, published on behalf of Materials Research Society by Cambridge University Press

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally

References

REFERENCES

Langer, R.S. and Vacanti, J.P., Sci. Am. 280, 86 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, J.-W. and Jun, H.-S., American Journal of Therapeutics 12, 580 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Am. J. Ophthalmol. 129, 704 (2000).Google Scholar
Burke, G.W., Ciancio, G., and Sollinger, H.W., Transplantation 77, S62 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Froud, T., Ricordi, C., Baidal, D.A., Hafiz, M.M., Ponte, G., Cure, P., Pileggi, A., Poggioli, R., Ichii, H., Khan, A., Ferreira, J.V., Pugliese, A., Esquenazi, V.V., Kenyon, N.S., and Alejandro, R., Am. J. Transplant 5, 2037 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juang, J.H., Bonner-Weir, S., Ogawa, Y., Vacanti, J.P., and Weir, G.C., Transplantation 61, 1557 (1996).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pileggi, A., Molano, R.D., Ricordi, C., Zahr, E., Collins, J., Valdes, R., and Inverardi, L., Transplantation 81, 1318 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Vos, P., Hamel, A.F., and Tatarkiewicz, K., Diabetologia 45, 159 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Najdahmadi, A., Lakey, J.R.T., and Botvinick, E., MRS Advances 3, 2399 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakey, J., Botvinick, E., and Najdahmadi, A., Nanoscale Imaging, Sensing, and Actuation for Biomedical Applications XV (2018).Google Scholar
de Vos, P., de Vos, P., Spasojevic, M., and Faas, M.M., Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 38 (2010).Google Scholar
Sakata, N., Aoki, T., Yoshimatsu, G., Tsuchiya, H., Hata, T., Katayose, Y., Egawa, S., and Unno, M., Diabetes. Metab. Res. Rev. 30, 1 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakamivala, A., Huang, Y., Chang, Y., Pan, Z., Nair, A., Hsieh, J., and Tang, L., Advanced Biosystems 3, 1900019 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nojoomi, A., Tamjid, E., Simchi, A., Bonakdar, S., and Stroeve, P., International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials 66, 105 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepper, A.R., Pawlick, R., Gala-Lopez, B., MacGillivary, A., Mazzuca, D.M., White, D.J.G., Toleikis, P.M., and James Shapiro, A.M., Transplantation 99, 2294 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phelps, E.A., Templeman, K.L., Thulé, P.M., and García, A.J., Drug Delivery and Translational Research 5, 125 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratner, B.D., Regen Biomater 3, 107 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurlin, R.E., Keating, M.T., Li, S., Lakey, J.R., de Feraudy, S., Shergill, B.S., and Botvinick, E.L., J. Tissue Eng. 8, 2041731417691645 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorson, T.J., Gurlin, R.E., Botvinick, E.L., and Mohraz, A., Acta Biomater. 94, 173 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najdahmadi, A., M Smink, A., de Vos, P., Lakey, J.R.T. and Botvinick, E., Cell Transplantation (2020).Google Scholar
Tonnesen, M.G., Feng, X., and Clark, R.A.F., Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings 5, 40 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar