Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:29:44.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetic Multifunctional Nanostructures as High-efficiency Catalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2016

Umanga De Silva ,
W. P. R. Liyanage  and
Manashi Nath
Umanga De Silva
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409.
W. P. R. Liyanage
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409.
Manashi Nath*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409.
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The search for high-efficiency and environmentally benign water splitting catalysts has been on the rise since this process is a source of renewable, clean energy. However the process is inherently slow, especially for the production of O2 from H2O (water oxidation) due to the high electron count and energy intensive bond formation of the reaction. Hence the search for novel catalysts for oxygen evolution reactions (OER) has led researchers to focus on various families of compounds including oxides and recently selenides. Multifunctional nanostructures containing the semiconductor electrocatalyst grafted onto an optically active metallic component might boost the catalytic activity even further due to efficient charge injection. Magnetically active catalysts will also be lucrative since that might induce better adhesion of the oxygenated species at the catalytically active site. In this report we introduce multifunctional, magnetic Au3Pd–CoSe nanostructures as high-efficiency OER electrocatalysts. These multifunctional nanostructures were synthesized by a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) reaction with cobalt acetylacetonate and elemental selenium on Au-Pd sputter coated silica substrate at 800°C. The morphology of these multifunctional nanostructures were mostly bifunctional Janus-like nanoparticles as seen through scanning and transmission electron microscopy. They also showed soft ferromagnetic behavior. These bifunctional nanoparticles were coated on the anodes of a water oxidation cell and it was observed that these nanoparticles showed a higher OER activity with lower onset potential for O2 evolution as compared to the conventional oxide-based OER electrocatalysts.

Keywords

catalyticchemical vapor deposition (CVD) (chemical reaction)energetic material
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 1 , Issue 34: Materials Design , 2016 , pp. 2401 - 2407
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kwak, I. H., Im, H. S., Jang, D. M., Kim, Y. W., Park, K., Lim, Y. R., & Park, J, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 5327–5334.Google Scholar
Millet, P., Mbemba, N., Grigoriev, S.A., Fateev, V.N., Aukauloo, A. and Etiévant, C., Int. J. Hyd. Energy 2011, 36, 4134–4142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, J., Shen, X., Ji, Z. and Zhu, G., 2013., J. Mater. Sci. 2013, 48, 7913–7919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorlin, Yelena, Jaramillo, T. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13612–13614 Google Scholar
Lee, Y., Suntivich, J., May, K.J., Perry, E.E. and Shao-Horn, Y.,J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 399–404.Google Scholar
Rabis, Annett, Rodriguez, Paramaconi, Schmidt, T. J. ACS Catalysis 2012, 2, 864–890.Google Scholar
Faber, M., Matthew, S., Song, J. Energy & Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 3519–3542.Google Scholar
Gong, Ming, Dai, H. Nano Research 2015, 8, 23–39.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Panitat, H., Wu, Y. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 1926–1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrigan, D. A. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1987, 134, 377–384.Google Scholar
Corrigan, D. A., Bendert, R. M. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1989, 136, 723–728.Google Scholar
Chialvo, D., Gennero, M. R., Chialvo, A. C. Electrochim Acta 1988, 33, 825–830.Google Scholar
Liang, Z. H., Zhu, Y. J., Hu, X. L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 3488–3491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, W., Lu, Z., Lei, X., Li, Y. and Sun, X., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 20402–20405.Google Scholar
Feng, Y., Gago, A., Timperman, L. and Alonso-Vante, N., Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 1009–1022.Google Scholar
Swesi, A. T., Masud, J., Nath, M. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, doi: 10.1039/C5EE02463C.Google Scholar
Feng, Y., He, T., Alonso-Vante, N. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 5252–5256.Google Scholar
Nekooi, M., Parisa, J., Akbari, M., Amini, M. K. Int. J. Hyd. Energy 2010, 35, 6392–6398.Google Scholar
Feng, Y., Alonso-Vante, N. Electrochimica Acta 2012, 72, 129–133.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., Zhang, C. Y. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 1782–1789.Google Scholar
Liyanage, W. P. R., Mishra, S., Song, K. A., Nath, M, RSC Advances 2014, 4, 28140–28147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlois, C., Li, Z.L., Yuan, J., Alloyeau, D., Nelayah, J., Bochicchio, D., Ferrando, R. and Ricolleau, C., Nanoscale 2012, 4, 3381–3388.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Cheng, H., Lyu, M., Fan, S., Liu, Q., Zhang, W., Zhi, Y., Wang, C., Xiao, C., Wei, S. and Ye, B.,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 15670–15675.Google Scholar
Gao, M.R., Cao, X., Gao, Q., Xu, Y.F., Zheng, Y.R., Jiang, J. and Yu, S.H., ACS Nano 2014, 8, 3970–3978.Google Scholar
Hou, Y., Lohe, M.R., Zhang, J., Liu, S., Zhuang, X. and Feng, X., Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 478–483.Google Scholar
Xia, C., Jiang, Q., Zhao, C., Hedhili, M.N. and Alshareef, H.N., Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 77–85.Google Scholar