Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:14:23.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Ar Implantation on the Precipitation in Au Ion Irradiated AISI 316L Solution Annealed Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2018

Ítalo M. Oyarzabal*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, RS, Brazil
Mariana de M. Timm
Affiliation:
Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, RS, Brazil
Willian M. Pasini
Affiliation:
Departamento de Metalurgia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, RS, Brazil
Franciele S. M. de Oliveira
Affiliation:
Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, RS, Brazil
Francine Tatsch
Affiliation:
Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, RS, Brazil
Lívio Amaral
Affiliation:
Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, RS, Brazil
Paulo F. P. Fichtner
Affiliation:
Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, RS, Brazil Departamento de Metalurgia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, RS, Brazil
*
Get access

Abstract

200 μm thick solution annealed AISI 316L stainless steel foils were implanted with Ar ions to produce a 0.25 at. % concentration-depth plateau extending from the near surface to a depth of ≈ 250 nm, and then annealed at 550°C for 2 hours to form small Ar bubbles and Ar-vacancy clusters. Distinct sets of samples (including control ones without Ar) were irradiated at the temperature of 550 °C with Au ions accelerated at 5 MeV to produce an average damage content about ≈36 dpa at the region containing the Ar plateau. These samples were investigated by transmission electron microscopy using plan-view specimens prepared by ion milling. In contrast with the control samples where the irradiation causes the formation of a high concentration of extended defects and large cavities, carbonite precipitation of 1:1 metal-carbon (MC) content with a cubic structure occurs only in the samples containing the Ar bubbles. This precipitation phenomenon is not commonly observed in the literature. The results are interpreted considering that the precipitate growth process requires the emission of vacancies which are synergistically absorbed by the growth of the Ar bubbles.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ishino, S., Sekimura, N., Murakami, K., and Abe, H., “Some remarks on in-situ studies using TEM-heavy-ion accelerator link from the stand point of extracting radiation damage caused by fast neutrons,” J. Nucl. Mater., vol. 471, pp. 167174, 2016.Google Scholar
Sourmail, T., “Literature review Precipitation in creep resistant austenitic stainless steels,” Materials Science and Technology, vol. 17, 2001.Google Scholar
Renault-Laborne, A., Malaplate, J., Pokor, C., Gavoille, P., Massoud, J. P., and Garnier, J., “Effects of Chemical Composition, Metallurgical State, and Stress During Irradiation on Microstructure of Neutron-Irradiated Austenitic Stainless Steels: Comparison of PWR and BOR-60 Irradiations,” in Materials Investigations to Improve the Safety and Performance of LWRs, 2010, pp. 2630.Google Scholar
Stoller, R. E., Toloczko, M. B., Was, G. S., Certain, A. G., Dwaraknath, S., and Garner, F. A., “On the use of SRIM for computing radiation damage exposure,” Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. B, vol. 310, pp. 7580, 2013.Google Scholar
Feldmann, G., Fichtner, P. F. P., and Zawislak, F. C., “The effects of He on the thermal stability of Cu-Al precipitates in aluminum,” Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. B, vol. 161-163, pp.10751079, 2000.Google Scholar
Feldmann, G., Fichtner, P. F. P., and Zawislak, F. C., “Investigatin of the effects of He bubbles on the nucleation, growth and thermal stability of Cu-Al nanoprecipitates in ion implanted Al foils,” Acta Materialia, vol. 52, pp. 693703, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaux, P., Métenier, A., and Xhoffer, C., “Carbon diffusion measurement in austenite in the temperature range 500 °C to 900 °C,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 38a, pp. 11691176, 2007.Google Scholar
Schroeder, H., Fichtner, P. F. P., and Trinkaus, H., “Inert Gas Bubble Coarsening Mechanisms,” Fundam. Asp. Inert Gases Solids, edited by Donnelly, S. E. and Evans, J. H., vol. 279, pp. 289297, 1991.Google Scholar
Fichtner, P. F. P., Kaschny, J. R., Yankov, R. A., Mücklich, A., Kreißig, U., and Skorupa, W., “Overpressurized bubbles versus voids formed in helium implanted and annealed silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 70, no. February, pp. 732734, 1997.Google Scholar
Jiang, H., Szlufarska, I., “Small-Angle Twist Grain Boundaries as Sinks for Point Defects,” Nature: Scientific Reports, 2018.Google Scholar
Renault-Laborne, A., Malaplate, J., Pokor, C., and Tanguy, B., “Characterization of Precipitates in 316 Stainless Steel Neutron-Irradiated at 390°C by the Combination of CDF-TEM, EF-TEM and HR-TEM,” Eff. Radiat. Nucl. Mater. 26th Vol., vol. 74, pp. 124, 2014.Google Scholar