Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:05:13.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-efficiency Device for Raman Scattering Measurement of Monolayer Graphene Using Optical Fibers Within the Small Bore of a High-power Magnet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2016

Tadashi Mitsui*
Affiliation:
Surface Physics and Structure Unit, National Institute for Materials Science, Sakura 3-13, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0003, JAPAN.
*
Get access

Abstract

To measure the Raman scattering spectrum of a monolayer graphene sample, we describe the design and development of a high-efficiency optical measurement device for operation within the small bore of a high-power magnet at low temperature. For the high-efficiency measurement of light emitted from this small region, we designed a compact confocal optics with lens focusing and tilting systems, and used a piezodriven translation stage that allows micron-scale focus control of the sample position. In addition, we show a detailed technique of adjustment of optical axes, and explain the importance of the focusing and tilting systems. The operation of the device was confirmed by Raman scattering measurements of monolayer graphene on quartz glass with a high signal-to-noise ratio. Though the light collection efficiency of the device is about 240-fold smaller than that of a conventional optical microscope, the device has a sufficient collection efficiency for detecting the Raman scattering light of monolayer graphene.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Novoselov, K. S. et al., Nature 438, 197 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geim, A. K. and Novoselov, K. S., Nature Mater. 6, 183 (2007).Google Scholar
Ferrari, A. C. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 187401 (2006).Google Scholar
Sadowski, M. L. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 266405 (2006).Google Scholar
Faugeras, C. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 186803 (2009).Google Scholar
Faugeras, C. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 036807 (2011).Google Scholar
Metzger, C. et al., Nano Lett. 10, 6 (2010).Google Scholar
Meyer, C., Sqalli, O., Lorenz, H., and Karrai, K., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76, 063706 (2005).Google Scholar
Meyer, C., Lorenz, H., and Karrai, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 2420 (2003).Google Scholar
Mitsui, T., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 113111 (2014).Google Scholar
Pohl, D. W., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 58, 54 (1987).Google Scholar