Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:28:40.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Facile Synthesis of Water-Soluble Graphene Quantum Dots/Graphene for Efficient Photodetector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2018

Sanju Gupta ,
Jared Walden ,
Alexander Banaszak  and
Sara B. Carrizosa
Sanju Gupta*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy and Advanced Materials Institute, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY42101, U.S.A.; E-Mail: [email protected]
Jared Walden
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY42101, U.S.A.
Alexander Banaszak
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy and Advanced Materials Institute, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY42101, U.S.A.; E-Mail: [email protected]
Sara B. Carrizosa
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY42101, U.S.A.
*
*(Email: [email protected])

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) are zero-dimensional material with characteristics derived from functionalized graphene precursors are graphene sheets a few nanometers in the lateral dimension having a several-layer thickness. Combining the structure of graphene with the quantum confinement and edge effects, GQDs possess unique chemical behavior and physical properties. Intense research activity in GQDs is attributed to their novel phenomena of charge transport and light absorption and photoluminescence excitation. The optical transitions are known to be available up to 6 eV in GQDs, applicable for ultraviolet photonics and optoelectronics devices, biomedical imaging capabilities and technologies. We present facile hydrothermal and solvothermal methods for synthesizing homogenous dispersed and uniform sized GQDs with a strong greenish and violet blue emission peaks at ∼10-14% yield. This approach enabled a large-scale production of aqueous GQD dispersions without the need for chemical stabilizers. The structure and emission mechanism of the GQDs have been studied by combining extensive characterization techniques and rigorous control experiments. We further demonstrate the distinctive advantages of such GQDs as high-performance photodetectors (PDs). Here we also report high-efficient photocurrent (PC) behaviors consisting of multilayer GQDs sandwiched between monolayer graphene sheets. It is conceivable that the observed unique PD characteristics proved to be dominated by tunneling of charge carriers which occurs through the multiple energy states within the bandgap of GQDs, based on bias-dependent variation of the band profiles. This results in novel dark current and PC behaviors. The external quantum efficiency (η) is predicted to be 47% at applied potential 2 V. These findings highlight rich photophysics and comparable performance of graphene/graphene oxide hybrids opening up potential applications as optoelectronic devices.

Keywords

Cdefectssolution deposition
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 3 , Issue 15-16: Nanomaterials , 2018 , pp. 817 - 824
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

References

Geim, A. and Novoselov, K., Nature Mater. 6, 183 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, S. and Carrizosa, S. B., J. Electron. Materials 44, 4492 (2015).Google Scholar
Gupta, S., vanMeveren, M. and Jasinski, J., Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 10, 10272 (2015).Google Scholar
Bai, S., Zhang, K., Wang, L., Sun, J., Luo, R., Li, D. and Chen, A., J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 7927 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, G. Zhang, L. and Zhang, J., Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 797 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geim, A. and Novoselov, K. S., Nat. Mater. 6, 652 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raccichini, R., Varzi, A., Passerini, S. and Scrosati, B., Nat. Mater. 14, 271 (2015).Google Scholar
Zhang, Q., Jie, J., Diao, S., Shao, Z., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., Deng, W., Hu, W., Xia, H., Yuan, X. and Lee, S.-T., ACS Nano 9, 1561 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstantatos, G., Badioli, M., Gaudreau, L., Osmond, J., Bernechea, M., Pelayo, F. de Arquer, G., Gatti, F. and Koppens, F. H. L., Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 363 (2012).Google Scholar
Li, Y., Hu, Y., Zhao, Y., Shi, G., Deng, L., Hou, Y. and Qu, L., Adv. Mater. 23, 776 (2011).Google Scholar
Yan, X., Cui, X. and Li, L. S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 5944 (2010).Google Scholar
Konstantatos, G. and Sargent, E. H., Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 391 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y., Wang, S., Li, C., Luo, P., Tao, L., Wei, Y. and Shi, G., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 9907 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brus, L. E., Appl. Phys. 53, 465 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efros, A. L. and Rosen, M., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 30, 475 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, C. O., Hwang, S. W., Kim, S., Shin, D. H., Kang, S. S., Kim, J. M., Jang, C. W., Kim, J. H., Lee, K. W., Choi, S.-H. and Hwang, E., Sci. Rep. 4: 5603 (2014).Google Scholar
Byrappa, K., Yoshimura, M., in Handbook of Hydrothermal Technology (Noyes Publications, New Jersey, USA, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, R., Sol, J.. Stat. Chem. 111, s11–17 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eda, G. and Chowalla, M., Adv. Mater. 22, 2392 (2010).Google Scholar
Pan, D., Zhang, J., Li, Z. and Wu, M., Adv. Mater. 22, 734 (2010).Google Scholar
Gupta, S., Smith, T., Banaszak, A. and Boeckl, J., Nanomaterials 7, 301 (2017).Google Scholar
Xiong, C., Aliev, A.E., Gnade, B. and Balkus, K.J. Jr. ACS Nano 2, 293 (2008).Google Scholar
Lee, E. H., Lewis, M. B., Blau, P. J., and Mansur, L. K., J. Mater. Res. 6, 610 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar