Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:35:55.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploration of Local cellulosic-fiber; its Modification and Potential use by the Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2018

N. Mokaloba  and
V. P. Kommula
N. Mokaloba*
Affiliation:
Botswana Institute for Technology Research and Innovation, Building Material Science Division; Gaborone, Botswana
V. P. Kommula
Affiliation:
University of Botswana, Faculty of Engineering & Technology; Department of Mechanical Engineering; Gaborone, Botswana
*
*Corresponding author: N. Mokaloba; E-mail: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Demand for newer, stronger, stiffer, yet lighter-weight and environmental friendly (biodegradable) materials in the fields such as automobile for non-structural applications are ever increasing. The principal reasons for using natural (cellulosic) fibers is they possess several attractive properties such their economic feasibility, enhanced sustainability, good specific mechanical properties, and desirable aspect ratio for good performance after melt-processing. Natural fiber composite materials are now being rapidly utilized in automobile industries, and they have become the forefront of research and development activity. An interesting alternative for reinforcing soft polymeric matrices with short fibers is the use of cellulose fibers which show remarkable reinforcing effects in thermoplastics such as polypropylene. The current study made an attempt to investigate the suitability of sisal fibers for automobile industry for non-structural and low-strength interior applications. In this work native sisal fibers were extracted and the effect of alkali treatment on their morphological, tensile, moisture absorption and thermal properties were studied. Scanning electron micrographs indicated roughening of the surface of the fiber strands due to the removal of the hemicellulose layer on alkali treatment. The maximum weight-gain for the composite prepared from treated fibers was 2.12 %, while that for the composite prepared from untreated fiber was 4.33 %. From the thermograms, the results indicate initial degradation for the treated fiber to have improved from 174 °C to 230 °C (56 °C shift) when compared to the untreated fiber. This fiber has competitive advantages when evaluated with other natural fibers. A polymer composite was processed from the chemically modified fiber, profiled against equivalent material systems in Ashby material property charts exhibited its suitability for light, low strength and low flexure material applications which can use a potential replacement of fibres being used currently.

Keywords

adhesioncompositefiberpolymer
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 3 , Issue 34-35: African Materials Research Society 2017 , 2018 , pp. 2015 - 2025
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kabir, M. M., Wang, H., Aravinthan, T., Cardona, F., Lau, K.T., (2011), “Effects of natural fiber surface on composite properties,” Energy, Environment and Sustainability eddBE2011 Proceedings, pp. 94–99.Google Scholar
Anandjiwala, D. R., John, M. J., (2008), “Recent developments in chemical modification and characterization of natural fiber-reinforced composites,” Polymer Composites, Part A, Vol. 40, pp. 872–894.Google Scholar
Partanen, A., & Carus, M. (2016). Wood and natural fiber composites current trend in consumer goods and automotive parts. Reinforced Plastics, 60(3), 170–173.Google Scholar
Wong, K. J., Yousif, B F., Low, K. O, (2009), “The effects of alkali treatment on the interfacial adhesion of bamboo fibers,” Materials: Design and Applications Proceedings, IMechE Vol. 224, Part L, pp. 139–147.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home, 2012.Google Scholar
Ashori, A. (2008), “Wood–plastic composites as promising green-composites for automotive industries,” Bioresource Technology, Vol. 99. No. 11, pp. 4661–4667.Google Scholar
Kalia, S., Kaith, B.S., Kaur, I., (2011), “Cellulose Fibers: Bio- and Nano-polymer Composites Green Chemistry and Technology,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, UK.Google Scholar
Xu, Z., Sun, D. W., Zeng, X. A. (2015), “Research developments in methods to reduce the carbon footprint of the food system: a review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci., Nutr., Vol. 55, pp. 1270–1286.Google Scholar
Ellison, G.C., McNaught, R., (2000), “The use of natural fibers in non-woven structures for application as automobile components substrates,” Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food (http://www.defra.gov.uk/farm/acu/reserach/reports/Rdrep10.PDF>).Google Scholar
Biron, M. (2013). Thermosets and composites: material selection, applications, manufacturing and cost analysis. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Agoudjil, B., Benchabane, A., Boudenne, A., Ibos, L., Fois, M., (2011). “Renewable materials to reduce building heat loss: characterization of date palm wood,” Energy Build. Vol. 43, pp. 491–497.Google Scholar
Pilla, S., 2011. Handbook of Bioplastics and Biocomposites Engineering Applications. Scrivener Publishing, USA.Google Scholar
Sanjeev, K. G., (2001), “Composite based on natural fibers and thermoplastic matrices,” PhD Thesis, University of London, Britain.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Chunjing, H., Yehong, Y., (2008), “Interfacial studies of sisal fiber reinforced high density polyethylene (HDPE) composites,” Composites: Part A., Vol. 39, pp. 570–578.Google Scholar
Nirmal, U., Singh, N., Hashim, J., Saijod, T.W. L., Nadia, Jamil., (2011), “On the effect of different polymer matrix and fiber treatment on single fiber pull-out test using betelnut fibers,” Materials and Design, Vol. 32, pp. 2717–2726.Google Scholar
Kommula, V. P., Reddy, K. O., Shukla, M., Marwala, T., & Rajulu, A. V. (2013). Physico-chemical, tensile, and thermal characterization of Napier grass (native African) fiber strands. International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization, 18(4), 303–314.Google Scholar
Xiaolin, X., (2008), “Cellulose fiber reinforced nylon 6 and nylon 66 composite,” PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA.Google Scholar
Lu, N., & Oza, S. (2013a). Thermal stability and thermo-mechanical properties of hemp-high density polyethylene composites: effect of two different chemical modifications. Composites Part B: Engineering, 44(1), 484–490.Google Scholar
Zhaoqhian, L., Xiaodonh, Z., Chonghua, P., (2011), “Effect of sisal fiber surface treatment on properties of sisal fiber reinforced polylactide composites,” International Journal of Polymer Science, Vol. 2011, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Sanjeevamurthy, G., Srinivas, G., (2012), “Sisal/coconut coir natural fibers-epoxy composite: Water absorption and mechanical properties,” International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology, Vol. 2, Issue 3, pp. 166–170.Google Scholar
Ashby, M. F., Gibson, U., Wegst, U., Olive, R., (1995), “The mechanical properties of natural materials. I. material property charts,” The Royal Science, Vol. 450, pp. 123–140.Google Scholar