Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-nwwvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-08T17:39:32.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Rheological Properties and Cytotoxicity of Bioinks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2019

Farzad Koosha ,
Daniel Silverman ,
Stephanie Taboada ,
Juyi Li  and
Miriam Rafailovich
Farzad Koosha
Affiliation:
Department of Oral Biology and Pathology, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY11794
Daniel Silverman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Chemical, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY11794
Stephanie Taboada
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Chemical, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY11794
Juyi Li
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Chemical, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY11794
Miriam Rafailovich*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Chemical, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY11794
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

We summarize the advantages and disadvantages of some of the most commonly used bioinks. We have probed the mechanical and cytotoxicity properties of Cellink and designed our own bioink from gelatin and Xanthan gum.

Keywords

biomaterialink-jet printing
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 4 , Issue 22: Biomaterials and Soft Materials , 2019 , pp. 1275 - 1283
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Ong, CS, Yesantharao, P, Huang, CY, Mattson, G, Boktor, J, Fukunishi, T, Zhang, H, Hibino, N. Pediatric research. 2018 Jan;83(1-2):223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, Kuan-Che, Pinkas-Sarafova, Adriana, Ricotta, Vincent, Cuiffo, Michael, Zhang, Linxi, Guo, Yichen, Chang, Chung-Chueh, Halada, Gary P., Simon, Marcia, and Rafailovich, Miriam. Soft matter 2018.Google Scholar
Kolesky, DB, Truby, RL, Gladman, AS, Busbee, TA, Homan, KA, Lewis, JA. Advanced Materials. 2014;26(19):3124-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J, Chen, M, Fan, X, Zhou, H. Journal of translational medicine. 2016;14(1):271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derakhshanfar, S, Mbeleck, R, Xu, K, Zhang, X, Zhong, W, Xing, M. Bioactive materials. 2018 30;3(2):144-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, YB, Lee, H, Yang, GH, Choi, CH, Lee, D, Hwang, H, Jung, WK, Yoon, H, Kim, GH. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2016 1;461:359-68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozbolat, IT, Yu, Y. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2013;60(3):691-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzl, K, Lin, S, Tytgat, L, Van Vlierberghe, S, Gu, L, Ovsianikov, A. Biofabrication, 2016,8 (3): 032002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, RE, Derby, B. International Materials Reviews. 2014 1;59(8):430-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopinathan, Janarthanan, and Noh, Insup. Biomaterials Research, 2018, ;22(1):11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Michael, Öztürk, Ece, Arlov, Øystein, Paul, Gatenholm, and Zenobi-Wong, Marcy. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2017 1;45(1):210-23..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hospodiuk, M, Dey, M, Sosnoski, D, Ozbolat, IT. Biotechnology Advances, 2017 1;35(2):217-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piras, Carmen C., Fernández-Prieto, Susana, and De Borggraeve, Wim M.. Biomaterials Science, 2017;5(10):1988-92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar