Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:57:21.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of ethanol addition to biodiesel-diesel oil blends (B7 and B20) on engine emissions and fuel consumption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2018

Alex de Oliveira ,
Osmano Souza Valente  and
José Ricardo Sodré
Alex de Oliveira*
Affiliation:
Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Av. Dom José Gaspar, 500, 30535-901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
Osmano Souza Valente
Affiliation:
Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Av. Dom José Gaspar, 500, 30535-901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
José Ricardo Sodré
Affiliation:
Birmingham City University, School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Millenium Point, Curzon St, Birmingham B4 7XG, UK
*
*(Email: [email protected])
Get access

Abstract

This work investigates a diesel engine operating with different blends of diesel fuel, biodiesel and anhydrous ethanol. Anhydrous ethanol (99.8% purity) was added to diesel oil with 7% (B7) and 20% of biodiesel (B20), with the concentrations of 5% (E5), 10% (E10) and 15% (E15) and 20% (E20). The experiments were conducted on a naturally aspirated, four-stroke, four-cylinder, direct injection 44 kW diesel engine, operating at a constant speed of 1800 RPM and at the fixed load of 27.5 kW to attain the lowest specific fuel consumption (SFC). The results were compared with the standard B7 operation, and showed that ethanol addition (B7E5) reduced up to 7% carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, associated with the decrease of the cylinder gas temperature, due to the ethanol high latent heat of evaporation, and to the ethanol lower carbon-to-hydrogen ratio and oxygen content. Total hydrocarbons (THC) emissions were reduced up to 14% with ethanol addition (B7E15), indicating higher fuel burn efficiency when ethanol is added to the fuel, as the oxygen available in ethanol molecule improves the burning during combustion. On the other hand, increasing biodiesel content in the fuel from 7% to 20% increased CO2 and THC emissions, both mitigated with the use of ethanol. Carbon monoxide (CO) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) emissions showed different behavior, depending on ethanol and biodiesel concentration. Both biodiesel and ethanol increased SFC, due to the reduction of fuel lower heating value (LHV), although ethanol addition slightly increased fuel conversion efficiency.

Keywords

ethanol
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 2 , Issue 64: International Materials Research Congress XXVI , 2017 , pp. 4005 - 4015
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Palash, S.M., Masjuki, H.H., Kalam, M.A., Masum, B.M., Sanjid, A., and Abedin, M.J., Energy Convers. Manag. 76, 400 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, B.S., Singh, R.K., Cho, H.M., and Lim, H.C., Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 59, 1358 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, L., Cheung, C.S., Zhang, W.G., and Huang, Z., Sci. Total Environ. 408, 914 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutak, W., Lukács, K., Szwaja, S., and Bereczky, Á., Fuel 154, 196 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaral, B.S., Novaes, F.J.M., Ramos, M. da C.K. V, Neto, F.R. de A., and Gioda, A., J. Aerosol Sci. 100, 155 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajesh Kumar, B. and Saravanan, S., Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 60, 84 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şahin, Z, Durgun, O., and Kurt, M., Energy Convers. Manag. 89, 175 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alviso, D., Krauch, F., Román, R., Maldonado, H., dos Santos, R.G., Rolón, J.C., and Darabiha, N., Fuel 191, 411 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulwan, D.B. and Joshi, S. V., Appl. Energy 88, 5042 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S.H., Youn, I.M., and Lee, C.S., Fuel 90, 748 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H., Hu, B., and Jin, C., Fuel 184, 440 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwanchareon, P., Luengnaruemitchai, A., and Jai-In, S., Fuel 86, 1053 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuszewski, H., Jaworski, A., and Ustrzycki, A., Fuel 208, 491 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamrozik, A., Energy Convers. Manag. 148, 461 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, N., Vigil, F.M., Burl Donaldson, A., and Darabseh, T., Fuel 115, 790 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sathiyamoorthi, R. and Sankaranarayanan, G., Renew. Energy 101, 747 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydın, F. and Öğüt, H., Renew. Energy 103, 688 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, Y.H., Abdullah, M.O., Nolasco-Hipolito, C., Zauzi, N.S.A., and Abdullah, G.W., Energy Convers. Manag. 132, 54 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsang, K.S., Zhang, Z.H., Cheung, C.S., and Chan, T.L., Energy & Fuels 24, 6156 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajav, E.A., Singh, B., and Bhattacharya, T.K., Biomass and Bioenergy 17, 357 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Hamdeh, N.H. and Alnefaie, K.A., Biomed Res. Int. 2015, (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majewski, W.A. and Khair, M.K., Diesel Emissions and Their Control (SAE International, Warrendale, PA, 2006).Google Scholar
Padala, S., Woo, C., Kook, S., and Hawkes, E.R., Fuel 109, 597 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldhaidhawi, M., Chiriac, R., and Badescu, V., Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 73, 178 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, B.-Q., Shuai, S.-J., Wang, J.-X., and He, H., Atmos. Environ. 37, 4965 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, M.M. and Rahman, M.M., Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 74, 938 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, J., Golovitchev, V.I., Redón Lurbe, P., and López Sánchez, J.J., Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2012, (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar