Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:56:59.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Lanthanum Doping and Oxygen Vacancy on Perovskite, Pyrochlore Oxide and Lanthanide Titanates: A First Principle Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2019

Amar Deep Pathak ,
Foram Thakkar ,
Suchismita Sanyal ,
Arian Nijmeijer  and
Hans Geerlings
Amar Deep Pathak*
Affiliation:
Shell Technology Centre, Bangalore, 562149, India.
Foram Thakkar
Affiliation:
Shell Technology Centre, Bangalore, 562149, India.
Suchismita Sanyal
Affiliation:
Shell Technology Centre, Bangalore, 562149, India.
Arian Nijmeijer
Affiliation:
Shell Technology Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hans Geerlings
Affiliation:
Shell Technology Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
*
*(Email: [email protected])
Get access

Abstract

The effects of La-substitution into SrTiO3 (STO) perovskite oxides on their phase structure, formation enthalpy and electrical conductivity have been investigated. La substitution in STO has been reported to show a significant enhancement in electronic conductivity in a wide-band-gap layered perovskite compound STO. Mixture of Lanthanum and Titanium oxide may lead to various phases including La2/3TiO3, La2Ti2O7 and La2TiO5. In this work, more than 50 structural models have been constructed by considering ionic state substituents, distance between substituents and their concentrations. We investigated the formation enthalpy, elastic properties and band gap by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. We have also investigated the effect of reducing environment on La2/3TiO3. The computed bulk modulus (∼2.4 % deviation) and band gap (∼12% deviation) of STO are in good agreement with the literature. Our results indicate that La substitution into STO could significantly reduce the band gap. Reduction in band gap is maximum when the substituents is present at low concentrations. Internal position of La substituents in STO affects the band gap marginally while energy remains almost same. Formation enthalpy of La2/3TiO3 from LaTiO3 is around 2 eV. La2/3TiO3 acts as band insulator (band gap = 2.8 eV). In reducing environment, the band gap of La2/3TiO3 significantly reduces. Sr substitution in La2/3TiO3 lower the band gap and formation enthalpy. La2Ti2O7 and La2TiO5 have higher band gap and lower bulk modulus than STO. Sr substitution is not feasible in La2Ti2O7 and La2TiO5.

Keywords

perovskitesdefectsdopantelastic properties
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 4 , Issue 20: Biomaterials and Soft Materials , 2019 , pp. 1167 - 1175
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kurokawa, H., Yang, L., Jacobson, C.P., De Jonghe, L.C. and Visco, S.J., J. Power. Sources, 164(2), 510-518 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baniecki, J. D., Ishii, M., Aso, H., Kurihara, K., and Ricinschi, D., J. Appl. Phys, 113(1), 013701(2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, J., Persson, A.H., Sudireddy, B.R., Irvine, J.T. and Thydén, K., J. Power. Sources, 372, 99-106 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanthi, N. and Sarma, D.D., Phys. Rev. B, 57(4), 2153 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Škapin, S.D., Kolar, D. and Suvorov, D., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 20(8), 1179-1185 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernzerhof, M. and Scuseria, G.E.. J. Chem. Phys, 110(11), 5029-5036 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H. C., Huang, C.W., Wu, J.C., and Lin, S.T., J. Phys. Chem. C 116(14), 7897-7903 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, R. O., and Rupprecht, G., Phys. Rev., 129(1), 90 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piskunov, S., Heifets, E., Eglitis, R.I. and Borstel, G., Comput. Mater. Sci., 29(2), 165-178 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R.H., Chakhmouradian, A.R. and Woodward, P.M., Phys. Chem. Miner, 27(8), 583-589 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinaci, A., Sevik, C., and Çağın, T., Phys. Rev. B, 82(15), 155114 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Mellouhi, F., Brothers, E.N., Lucero, M.J., Bulik, I.W. and Scuseria, G.E., Phys. Rev. B, 87(3), 035107 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardona, M., Phys. Rev., 140(2A), A651 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganguly, P., Parkash, O., and Rao, C.N.R.. Phys. Status Solidi A, 36, 669 – 678 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cwik, M., Lorenz, T., Baier, J., Müller, R., André, G., Bourée, F., Lichtenberg, F., Freimuth, A., Schmitz, R., Müller-Hartmann, E., and Braden, M., Phys. Rev. B, 68(6), 060401 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasperin, M Acta Crystallogr. B, 31(8), 2129-2130 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillen, M., and Bertaut, E.F., Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l’Academie des Sciences, Serie B, 262(14), 962 (1966).Google Scholar
Kresse, G. and Furthmüller, J., Phys. Rev. B, 54(16), 11169 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pathak et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S3

Download Pathak et al. supplementary material(File)
File 158.9 KB