No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Derivation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient based on Time Variation of the Relaxation Mass Depths of Cs-137 in Soil Contaminated by the Fukushima NPP Accident
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 January 2019
Abstract
The accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant occurred following the Great East Japan Earthquake on March 11, 2011, and led to the release of volatile radionuclides, which were deposited on the environment in the Fukushima prefecture and the neighbouring areas. After the short-lived I-131, radiocaesium such as Cs-134 and Cs-137 have controlled radiation dose rate. The authors derived the apparent diffusion coefficients (Da) of some radionuclides such as Cs-134 and Cs-137 based on time variation of the depth distributions of respective radionuclides in soil obtained in field investigations in earlier studies. Almost all Da-values were of order 10-14 (m2·s−1) and well consistent with distribution coefficients (Kd) obtained from batch experiments. Whilst, field investigations for the relaxation mass depths of Cs-137 in soil by a scraper plate method were conducted at totally 85 locations over a period of nearly 6 years from December 2011 in the Fukushima prefecture and the neighbouring prefectures, and time variation of the effective relaxation mass depths was recently reported. Consequently, the effective relaxation mass depths of Cs-137 showed a tendency to linearly increase with increasing time. This indicates that radiocaesium gradually moves to the deeper part of soil with time. In this study, Da based on Fick’s diffusion equation was derived based on time variation of the effective relaxation mass depths of Cs-137 in soil. In order to calculate the Da based on Fick’s law, correlation between relaxation depth and square root of elapsed time was derived from the correlation between effective relaxation mass depth and elapsed time (where, relaxation depth is defined as the depth of 1/e of radionuclide concentration at the ground surface and can calculate by relaxation mass depth/soil density). The calculated Da of Cs-137 was of order 10-12 (m2·s−1) , which was about 2 orders of magnitude higher than Da-values that the authors previously reported as described above. Considering that almost all relaxation depths of Cs-137 were shallow within 2cm in depth from the ground surface and near the surface layer of soil is unsaturated, it is considered that Da estimated in this analysis includes the effect of dispersion by advection (by flow in the vertical direction of rainwater).
Keywords
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- MRS Advances , Volume 4 , Issue 17-18: Energy-Transfer, Storage and Conversion , 2019 , pp. 1001 - 1007
- Copyright
- Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019
References
REFERENCES
Ministry of the Environment (MOE), “https://www.env.go.jp/chemi/rhm/h29kisoshiryo/h29kiso-02-02-05.html”, final access: November 1 (2018) [in Japanese].Google Scholar
Chino, M., Nakayama, H., Nagai, H., Terada, H., Katata, G. and Yamazawa, H., J. Nucl. Sci. and Technol., 48 (7), 1129-1134 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters Government of Japan, Report of Japanese Government to the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety –The Accident at TEPCO’s Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations– (2011).Google Scholar
National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission (NAIIC) Reports (July 5, 2012), “http://warp.da.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/ 3856371/naiic.go.jp/en/report/”, final access: July 21 (2014).Google Scholar
Stohl, A., Seibert, P., Wotawa, G., Arnold, D., Burkhart, J. F., Eckhardt, S., Tapia, C., Vargas, A. and Yasunari, T. J., Atmospheric Chem. and Phys., 12, 2313-2343 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radioisotope Association, Japan, “Radioisotope Pocket Book,” 9th ed., Maruzen, Tokyo (2000) [in Japanese].Google Scholar
Sato, H., Niizato, T., Amano, K., Tanaka, S. and Aoki, K., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1518, pp.277-282 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, H., Niizato, T., Tanaka, S., Abe, H. and Aoki, K., Asia Oceania Soc. (AOGS 2014), July 28-August 1, 2014, Sapporo, Japan, Abstracts, No.: IG23-D2-AM1-EB-008 (IG23-A024) (2014).Google Scholar
Sato, H., Mini-Symposium on Earthquake, Fault, Clay and Water: For Understanding Earthquake and Fault, March 17, 2015, Okayama University, Handout document (2015) [in Japanese].Google Scholar
Sato, H., Proceedings of the International Symposium on Radiological Issues for Fukushima’s Revitalized Future, Kyoto University Research Reactor Institute, pp.85-91 (2015).Google Scholar
Sato, H. and Yoshii, M., Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Symposium on Safety, 2017 (APSS 2017), Paper No.: SD4-03, pp.1-8 (2017).Google Scholar
Sato, H. and Chikami, T., 5th International Conference on Asian Nuclear Prospects 2016 (ANUP 2016), October 24-27, 2016, Sendai, Japan, Program and Abstracts, No.: A3-5 (2016).Google Scholar
Sato, H. and Yoshii, M., Asian Symposium on Risk Assessment and Management (ASRAM2018), October 10-12, 2018, Xiamen, China, ASRAM2018-089, 10 pages (pdf format) (2018).Google Scholar
Honda, M., Mitsuzaki, H., Miyake, Y., Maejima, Y., Yamagata, T. and Nagai, H., J. Envir. Radioactivity, 146, 35-43 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konoplev, A., 2nd Caesium Workshop: Meeting Challenges for Fukushima Recovery, 6-9 October, 2014, Fukushima, Japan, Handout document (2014).Google Scholar
Eguchi, S., 2nd Caesium Workshop: Meeting Challenges for Fukushima Recovery, 6-9 October, 2014, Fukushima, Japan, Handout document (2014).Google Scholar
Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), Contract Research Results Report on the Integration of the Distribution Data of Radioactive Materials due to the Tokyo Electric Power Company Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station Accident, Part 1, pp.78-98 (2017) [in Japanese].Google Scholar