Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:22:35.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chloride diffusion in pore water in Olkiluoto veined gneiss and pegmatitic granite from a structural perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2017

J. Sammaljärvi*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Radiochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Helsinki, Finland
J. Ikonen
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Radiochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Helsinki, Finland
M. Voutilainen
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Radiochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Helsinki, Finland
P. Kekäläinen
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
A. Lindberg
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Finland, Finland
M. Siitari-Kauppi
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Radiochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Helsinki, Finland
P. Pitkänen
Affiliation:
Posiva oy, Olkiluoto, 27160 Eurajoki, Finland
L. Koskinen
Affiliation:
Posiva oy, Olkiluoto, 27160 Eurajoki, Finland
*
Get access

Abstract

Spent nuclear fuel from Finnish power plants is planned to be deposited deep in the crystalline bedrock in Olkiluoto, Finland. The bedrock and more specifically the elemental composition of ground water, which is composed of the fracture water and the matrix pore water, needs to be well characterized to assess the risks inherent to the long term safety of the site. To this end, it is valuable to investigate elemental composition of the matrix pore water since it tends to conserve hydrogeological signals for longer time spans compared to open fracture waters.

In this study, the chloride concentration of matrix pore water in veined gneiss (VGN) and pegmatitic granite (PGR) samples were investigated. Chloride was out-diffused from the naturally saturated rock cores into deionized water. Chloride pore diffusion coefficients were derived by modelling the chloride breakthrough curves obtained from the out-diffusion experiments. Two component modelling gave best fit to the experimental results. There two diffusion coefficients were (9±2)×10-11 m2/s and (0.5±0.1)×10-11 m2/s for PGR and (2.5±0.5)×10-11 m2/s and (0.4±0.1)×10-11 m2/s for VGN. Porosity distribution and total porosities of the rock samples were studied with the C-14-PMMA autoradiography. Porosity for PGR was found to be 0.6 % with large mineral transecting fissures, and porosity for VGN was found to be 0.7 % with highly porous mineral clusters connected to each other via grain boundaries and intragranular pores. The findings here show that heterogeneity has to be taken into account in modelling to find better agreement with the experimental results. C-14-PMMA autoradiography results indicate dual-component behavior for diffusion in PGR and VGN which were used in the modelling.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

POSIVA, Safety Case for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel at Olkiluoto - Synthesis 2012, POSIVA Report 2012-12, 2012.Google Scholar
Smellie, J.(ed), Pitkänen, P., Koskinen, L., Aaltonen, I., Eichinger, F., Waber, N., Sahlstedt, E., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Karhu, J., Löfman, J., Poteri, A., Posiva Oy Working report 2014-27, 2014.Google Scholar
Norton, D., Knapp, R., Am. J. Sci. 277, 913936 (1977).Google Scholar
Robinet, J-C., Sardini, P., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Prét, D., Yven, B., Sediment. Geol. 321 1-10 (2015)Google Scholar
Sardini, P., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Beaufort, D., Hellmuth, K-H., Am. Mineral. 91, 10691080 (2006).Google Scholar
Voutilainen, M., Poteri, A., Helariutta, K., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Nilsson, K., Andersson, P., Byegård, J., Skålberg, M., Kekäläinen, P., Timonen, J., Lindberg, A., Pitkänen, P., Kemppainen, K., Liimatainen, J., Hautojärvi, A., Koskinen, L., WM2014 Conference proceedings, 14258 (2014).Google Scholar
Kuva, J., Voutilainen, M., Kekäläinen, P., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Timonen, J., Koskinen, L., Transport Porous Med. 107, 187204 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sammaljärvi, J., Lindberg, A., Ikonen, J., Voutilainen, M., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Koskinen, L. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXVII, edited by Duro, L., Giménez, J., Casas, I. and de Pablo, J., (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1665, Pittsburgh, PA, 2014) pp. 3137.Google Scholar
Voutilainen, M., Ikonen, J., Sammaljärvi, J., Kuva, J., Lindberg, A., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Koskinen, L., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., this issue.Google Scholar
Voutilainen, M., Ikonen, J., Kekäläinen, P., Sammaljärvi, J., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Lindberg, A., Kuva, J., Timonen, J., Posiva Working report 2016-XX (in press).Google Scholar
Sardini, P., Robinet, J-C., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Delay, F., Hellmuth, K-H., J. Contam. Hydrol. 93(1-4), 2137, (2007)Google Scholar
Voutilainen, M., Sardini, P., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Kekäläinen, P., Aho, V., Myllys, M., J. Timonen Transport Porous Med. 96, 319336 (2013).Google Scholar
Ikonen, J., Sammaljärvi, J., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Voutilainen, M., Lindberg, A., Kuva, J., Timonen, J., Posiva Oy Working Report 2014-68, 2015.Google Scholar
Hespe, E.D., Atom. Energy Rev. 9, 195207, (1971)Google Scholar
Sammaljärvi, J., Jokelainen, L., Ikonen, J., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Eng. Geol. 135-136, 5259 (2012).Google Scholar
Sardini, P., Caner, L., Mossler, P., Mazurier, A., Hellmuth, K-H., Graham, R. C., Rossi, A. M., Siitari-Kauppi, M., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 303, 1123 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Loon, L.R., Soler, J.M., Bradbury, M.H., J. Contam. Hydrol. 61(1-4), 7383 (2003).Google Scholar