Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T19:39:52.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biopatterning of Keratinocytes in Aqueous Two-Phase Systems as a Potential Tool for Skin Tissue Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2017

Rishima Agarwal*
Affiliation:
School of Biomedical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS , B3H 4R2, Canada
Kristin Robin Ko
Affiliation:
School of Biomedical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS , B3H 4R2, Canada
Paul F. Gratzer
Affiliation:
School of Biomedical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS , B3H 4R2, Canada
John P. Frampton
Affiliation:
School of Biomedical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS , B3H 4R2, Canada
*
Get access

Abstract

Extrusion-based bioprinting (EBP) is limited by loss of pattern fidelity when printing on wet substrates. This can be overcome using aqueous two-phase systems (ATPSs) as novel ink formulations for EBP. In this study, optimal concentrations of ATPS “inks” were determined and used to pattern human epidermal keratinocyte (HEK001) colonies on a wet substrate for promoting epidermal growth. Four equilibrated and non-equilibrated ATPS formulations were tested for stable ATPS formation and uniform cell patterning. We identified an optimal formulation that produced stable droplets on a standard tissue culture plate coated with PEG. This process was also tested on an acellular dermal matrix (DermGENTM ) to evaluate biopattern fidelity on a tissue matrix. Cell proliferation and formation of adherens junctions between cells were analyzed by immunocytochemistry. Non-equilibrated 5.0% PEG and 5.0% DEX solutions formed tighter colonies than equilibrated solutions containing identical total polymer concentrations. Cells patterned in colonies displayed higher cell viability and increased formation of E-cadherin junctions compared to non-patterned cells. Finally, when the cells were patterned on DermGENTM , discrete cell colonies were observed. This suggests that ATPS EBP holds promise for biopatterning epidermal keratinocyte cells to improve skin tissue engineering.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Klebe, R., Exp. Cell Res. 179, 362 (1988).Google Scholar
Vijayavenkataraman, S., Lu, W.F., and Fuh, J.Y., Biofabrication 8, 1 (2016).Google Scholar
Ozbolat, T. and Hospodiuk, M., Biomaterials 76, 321 (2016).Google Scholar
Jakab, K., Norotte, C., Damon, B., Marga, F., Neagu, A., Besch-williford, C. L, Kachurin, A., Church, K.H., Park, H., Mironov, V., and Markwald, R., Tissue Eng. Part A 14, 413 (2008).Google Scholar
Skardal, A., Zhang, J., and Prestwich, G.D., Biomaterials 31, 6173 (2010).Google Scholar
Kim, G., Ahn, S., Kim, Y., Cho, Y., and Chun, W., J. Mater. Chem. 21, 6165 (2011).Google Scholar
Albertsson, P.A. k., Partition of Cell Particles and Macromolecules, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
Frampton, J.P., White, J.B., Abraham, A.T., and Takayama, S., J. Vis. Exp. 73, 50304 (2013).Google Scholar
Frampton, J.P., Leung, B.M., Bingham, E.L., Lesher-Perez, S.C., Wang, J.D., Sarhan, H.T., El-Sayed, M.E.H., Feinberg, S.E., and Takayama, S., Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 1694 (2015).Google Scholar