Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:14:45.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ba1.2-xCsxM1.2-x/2Ti6.8+x/2O16 (M = Ni, Zn) hollandites for the immobilisation of radiocaesium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2020

D. J. Bailey*
Affiliation:
- Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
M. C. Stennett
Affiliation:
- Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
N. C. Hyatt
Affiliation:
- Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
*
Get access

Abstract

Improved budgeting of heat loads arising from radiogenic heating in high level wastes (HLW) could allow enhanced usage of geological disposal facility space. Separation of high heat generating nuclides from HLW, such as Cs, would simplify management of heat loads. A potential host matrix for Cs-disposal is hollandite. The incorporation of Cs into the hollandite phase is aided by substitution of cations on the B-site of the structure; these ions may include Ni and Zn. Two series of hollandites, Ni-substituted and Zn-substituted, were synthesised via an alkoxide-nitrate route and consolidated by cold uniaxial pressing and sintering or by hot isostatic pressing. Characterisation of the resultant material by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy found that hollandite was formed for all levels of substitution. Materials produced via HIP were found to be denser indicating lower Cs loss. HIPed Ni hollandites were found to contain fewer secondary phases and it was concluded that they were the most suitable candidates

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

Byström, A. and Byström, A. M., Acta Crystallogr ., 1950, 3, 146154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringwood, A. E., Reeve, K. D., Levins, D. M. and Ramm, E. J., in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, eds. Ewing, R. C. and Lutze, W., North Holland Physics Publishing, New York, 1988, pp. 233335.Google Scholar
Sinclair, W., McLaughlin, G. M. and Ringwood, A. E., Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem., 1980, 36, 29132918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, M. L. and Withers, R. L., J. Solid State Chem., 2005, 178, 19031914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, J. E., Von Dreele, R. B. and Buseck, P. R., Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem., 1982, 38, 10561065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringwood, A. E., Kesson, S. E., Ware, N. G., Hibberson, W. and Major, A., Nature, 1979, 278, 219223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringwood, A. E., Kesson, S. E., Ware, N. G., Hibberson, W. O. and Major, A., Geochem. J., 1979, 13, 141165.10.2343/geochemj.13.141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bursill, L. A. and Grzinic, G., Acta Crystallogr ., 1980, 36, 29022913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyatt, N. C., Stennett, M. C., Fiddy, S. G., Wellings, J. S., Dutton, S. S., Maddrell, E. R., Connelly, A. J. and Lee, W. E., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 2006, 932, 583-591.10.1557/PROC-932-60.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubin-Chevaldonnet, V., Caurant, D., Dannoux, A., Gourier, D., Charpentier, T., Mazerolles, L. and Advocat, T., J. Nucl. Mater., 2007, 366, 137160.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.12.051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, D. J., Stennett, M. C., Mason, A. R. and Hyatt, N. C., J. Nucl. Mater., 2018, 503, 164170.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grote, R., Zhao, M., Shuller-Nickles, L., Amoroso, J., Gong, W., Lilova, K., Navrotsky, A., Tang, M. and Brinkman, K. S., J. Mater. Sci., 2019, 54, 11121125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheary, R. W., Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B, 1986, 42, 229236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar